Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLauritsen, J
dc.contributor.authorSauvé, N
dc.contributor.authorTryakin, A
dc.contributor.authorJiang, DM
dc.contributor.authorHuddart, R
dc.contributor.authorHeng, DYC
dc.contributor.authorTerbuch, A
dc.contributor.authorWinquist, E
dc.contributor.authorChovanec, M
dc.contributor.authorHentrich, M
dc.contributor.authorFankhauser, CD
dc.contributor.authorShamash, J
dc.contributor.authorDel Muro, XG
dc.contributor.authorVaughn, D
dc.contributor.authorHeidenreich, A
dc.contributor.authorSternberg, CN
dc.contributor.authorSweeney, C
dc.contributor.authorNecchi, A
dc.contributor.authorBokemeyer, C
dc.contributor.authorBandak, M
dc.contributor.authorJandari, A
dc.contributor.authorCollette, L
dc.contributor.authorGillessen, S
dc.contributor.authorBeyer, J
dc.contributor.authorDaugaard, G
dc.coverage.spatialEngland
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-15T12:16:28Z
dc.date.available2024-04-15T12:16:28Z
dc.date.issued2023-11-23
dc.identifier10.1038/s41416-023-02443-3
dc.identifier.citationBritish Journal of Cancer, 2023, 129 (11), pp. 1759 - 1765
dc.identifier.issn0007-0920
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.icr.ac.uk/handle/internal/6205
dc.identifier.eissn1532-1827
dc.identifier.eissn1532-1827
dc.identifier.doi10.1038/s41416-023-02443-3
dc.identifier.doi10.1038/s41416-023-02443-3
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Active surveillance after orchiectomy is the preferred management in clinical stage I (CSI) germ-cell tumours (GCT) associated with a 15 to 30% relapse rate. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In the IGCCCG Update database, we compared the outcomes of gonadal disseminated GCT relapsing from initial CSI to outcomes of patients with de novo metastatic GCT. RESULTS: A total of 1014 seminoma (Sem) [298 (29.4%) relapsed from CSI, 716 (70.6%) de novo] and 3103 non-seminoma (NSem) [626 (20.2%) relapsed from CSI, 2477 (79.8%) de novo] were identified. Among Sem, no statistically significant differences in PFS and OS were found between patients relapsing from CSI and de novo metastatic disease [5-year progression-free survival (5y-PFS) 87.6% versus 88.5%; 5-year overall survival (5y-OS) 93.2% versus 96.1%). Among NSem, PFS and OS were higher overall in relapsing CSI patients (5y-PFS 84.6% versus 80.0%; 5y-OS 93.3% versus 88.7%), but there were no differences within the same IGCCCG prognostic groups (HR = 0.89; 95% CI: 0.70-1.12). Relapses in the intermediate or poor prognostic groups occurred in 11/298 (4%) Sem and 112/626 (18%) NSem. CONCLUSION: Relapsing CSI GCT patients expect similar survival compared to de novo metastatic patients of the same ICCCCG prognostic group. Intermediate and poor prognosis relapses from initial CSI expose patients to unnecessary toxicity from more intensive treatments.
dc.formatPrint-Electronic
dc.format.extent1759 - 1765
dc.languageeng
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherSPRINGERNATURE
dc.relation.ispartofBritish Journal of Cancer
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subjectMale
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectTesticular Neoplasms
dc.subjectPrognosis
dc.subjectNeoplasms, Germ Cell and Embryonal
dc.subjectProgression-Free Survival
dc.subjectSeminoma
dc.subjectNeoplasms, Second Primary
dc.subjectRecurrence
dc.titleOutcomes of relapsed clinical stage I versus de novo metastatic testicular cancer patients: an analysis of the IGCCCG Update database.
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.dateAccepted2023-09-14
dc.date.updated2024-04-15T10:58:25Z
rioxxterms.versionVoR
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1038/s41416-023-02443-3
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2023-11-23
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review
pubs.author-urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37777577
pubs.issue11
pubs.organisational-groupICR
pubs.organisational-groupICR/Primary Group
pubs.organisational-groupICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions
pubs.organisational-groupICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Radiotherapy and Imaging
pubs.organisational-groupICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Radiotherapy and Imaging/Clinical Academic Radiotherapy (Huddart)
pubs.publication-statusPublished
pubs.publisher-urlhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41416-023-02443-3
pubs.volume129
icr.researchteamClinic Acad RT Huddart
dc.contributor.icrauthorHuddart, Robert
icr.provenanceDeposited by Mrs Rosalind Wright (impersonating Prof Robert Huddart) on 2024-04-15. Deposit type is initial. No. of files: 1. Files: Outcomes of relapsed clinical stage I versus de novo metastatic testicular cancer patients an analysis of the IGCCCG Update .pdf


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following collection(s)

Show simple item record

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/