Long-Term Follow-Up of the Intergroup Exemestane Study.
Date
2017-08-01Author
Morden, JP
Alvarez, I
Bertelli, G
Coates, AS
Coleman, R
Fallowfield, L
Jassem, J
Jones, S
Kilburn, L
Lønning, PE
Ortmann, O
Snowdon, C
van de Velde, C
Andersen, J
Del Mastro, L
Dodwell, D
Holmberg, S
Nicholas, H
Paridaens, R
Bliss, JM
Coombes, RC
Type
Journal Article
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Purpose The Intergroup Exemestane Study, an investigator-led study of 4,724 postmenopausal patients with early breast cancer (clinical trial information: ISRCTN11883920), has previously demonstrated that a switch from adjuvant endocrine therapy after 2 to 3 years of tamoxifen to exemestane was associated with clinically relevant improvements in efficacy. Here, we report the final efficacy analyses of this cohort. Patients and Methods Patients who remained disease free after 2 to 3 years of adjuvant tamoxifen were randomly assigned to continue tamoxifen or switch to exemestane to complete a total of 5 years of adjuvant endocrine therapy. Given the large number of non-breast cancer-related deaths now reported, breast cancer-free survival (BCFS), with censorship of intercurrent deaths, was the primary survival end point of interest. Analyses focus on patients with estrogen receptor-positive or unknown tumors (n = 4,599). Results At the time of the data snapshot, median follow-up was 120 months. In the population that was estrogen receptor positive or had unknown estrogen receptor status, 1,111 BCFS events were observed with 508 (22.1%) of 2,294 patients in the exemestane group and 603 (26.2%) of 2,305 patients in the tamoxifen group. The data corresponded to an absolute difference (between exemestane and tamoxifen) at 10 years of 4.0% (95% CI, 1.2% to 6.7%), and the hazard ratio (HR) of 0.81 (95% CI, 0.72 to 0.92) favored exemestane. This difference remained in multivariable analysis that was adjusted for nodal status, prior use of hormone replacement therapy, and prior chemotherapy (HR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.71 to 0.90; P < .001). A modest improvement in overall survival was seen with exemestane; the absolute difference (between exemestane and tamoxifen) at 10 years in the population that was estrogen receptor positive or had unknown estrogen receptor status was 2.1% (95% CI, -0.5% to 4.6%), and the HR was 0.89 (95% CI, 0.78 to 1.01; P = .08). For the intention-to-treat population, the absolute difference was 1.6% (95% CI, -0.9% to 4.1%); the HR was 0.91 (95% CI, 0.80 to 1.03, P = .15). No statistically significant difference was observed in the proportion of patients who reported a fracture event in the post-treatment period. Conclusion The Intergroup Exemestane Study and contemporaneous studies have established that a strategy of switching to an aromatase inhibitor after 2 to 3 years of tamoxifen can lead to sustained benefits in terms of reduction of disease recurrence and breast cancer mortality.
Collections
Subject
Humans
Breast Neoplasms
Neoplasm Metastasis
Tamoxifen
Androstadienes
Receptors, Estrogen
Antineoplastic Agents
Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal
Disease-Free Survival
Survival Rate
Follow-Up Studies
Postmenopause
Time Factors
Aged
Middle Aged
Female
Research team
Clinical Trials & Statistics Unit
ICR-CTSU Urology and Head and Neck Trials Team
Language
eng
Date accepted
2017-02-14
License start date
2017-08
Citation
Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2017, 35 (22), pp. 2507 - 2514
Publisher
LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS