Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMurray, I
dc.contributor.authorChittenden, SJ
dc.contributor.authorDenis-Bacelar, AM
dc.contributor.authorHindorf, C
dc.contributor.authorParker, CC
dc.contributor.authorChua, S
dc.contributor.authorFlux, GD
dc.date.accessioned2017-07-19T15:16:13Z
dc.date.issued2017-10
dc.identifier.citationEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2017, 44 (11), pp. 1832 - 1844
dc.identifier.issn1619-7070
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.icr.ac.uk/handle/internal/722
dc.identifier.eissn1619-7089
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00259-017-3744-y
dc.description.abstractPurpose The aims of this study were to calculate bone lesion absorbed doses resulting from a weight-based administration of 223 Ra-dichloride, to assess the relationship between those doses and corresponding 18 F-fluoride uptake and to assess the potential of quantitative 18 F-fluoride imaging to predict response to treatment.Methods Five patients received two intravenous injections of 223 Ra-dichloride, 6 weeks apart, at 110 kBq/kg whole-body weight. The biodistribution of 223 Ra in metastatic lesions as a function of time after administration as well as associated lesion dosimetry were determined from serial 223 Ra scans. PET/CT imaging using 18 F-fluoride was performed prior to the first treatment (baseline), and at week 6 immediately before the second treatment and at week 12 after baseline.Results Absorbed doses to metastatic bone lesions ranged from 0.6 Gy to 44.1 Gy. For individual patients, there was an average factor difference of 5.3 (range 2.5-11.0) between the maximum and minimum lesion dose. A relationship between lesion-absorbed doses and serial changes in 18 F-fluoride uptake was demonstrated (r 2  = 0.52). A log-linear relationship was demonstrated (r 2  = 0.77) between baseline measurements of 18 F-fluoride uptake prior to 223 Ra-dichloride therapy and changes in uptake 12 weeks after the first cycle of therapy. Correlations were also observed between both 223 Ra and 18 F-fluoride uptake in lesions (r = 0.75) as well as between 223 Ra absorbed dose and 18 F-fluoride uptake (r = 0.96).Conclusions There is both inter-patient and intra-patient heterogeneity of absorbed dose estimates to metastatic lesions. A relationship between 223 Ra lesion absorbed dose and subsequent lesion response was observed. Analysis of this small group of patients suggests that baseline uptake of 18 F-fluoride in bone metastases is significantly correlated with corresponding uptake of 223 Ra, the associated 223 Ra absorbed dose and subsequent lesion response to treatment.
dc.formatPrint-Electronic
dc.format.extent1832 - 1844
dc.languageeng
dc.language.isoeng
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectRadium
dc.subjectRadioisotopes
dc.subjectFluorine Radioisotopes
dc.subjectRadiopharmaceuticals
dc.subjectAged
dc.subjectMiddle Aged
dc.subjectMale
dc.subjectClinical Trials, Phase I as Topic
dc.subjectProstatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant
dc.subjectPositron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography
dc.titleThe potential of <sup>223</sup>Ra and <sup>18</sup>F-fluoride imaging to predict bone lesion response to treatment with <sup>223</sup>Ra-dichloride in castration-resistant prostate cancer.
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.dateAccepted2017-05-25
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1007/s00259-017-3744-y
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2017-10
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review
dc.relation.isPartOfEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging
pubs.issue11
pubs.notesNot known
pubs.organisational-group/ICR
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Radiotherapy and Imaging
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Radiotherapy and Imaging/Radioisotope Physics
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Radiotherapy and Imaging/Radioisotope Physics/Radioisotope Physics (hon.)
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/Royal Marsden Clinical Units
pubs.organisational-group/ICR
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Radiotherapy and Imaging
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Radiotherapy and Imaging/Radioisotope Physics
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Radiotherapy and Imaging/Radioisotope Physics/Radioisotope Physics (hon.)
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/Royal Marsden Clinical Units
pubs.publication-statusPublished
pubs.volume44
pubs.embargo.termsNot known
icr.researchteamRadioisotope Physicsen_US
dc.contributor.icrauthorMurray,
dc.contributor.icrauthorFlux, Glenn
dc.contributor.icrauthorParker, Chris
dc.contributor.icrauthorMarsden,


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following collection(s)

Show simple item record

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0