Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWeller, A
dc.contributor.authorPapoutsaki, MV
dc.contributor.authorWaterton, JC
dc.contributor.authorChiti, A
dc.contributor.authorStroobants, S
dc.contributor.authorKuijer, J
dc.contributor.authorBlackledge, M
dc.contributor.authorMorgan, V
dc.contributor.authordeSouza, NM
dc.date.accessioned2017-08-03T13:59:26Z
dc.date.issued2017-11-01
dc.identifier.citationEuropean radiology, 2017, 27 (11), pp. 4552 - 4562
dc.identifier.issn0938-7994
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.icr.ac.uk/handle/internal/759
dc.identifier.eissn1432-1084
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00330-017-4828-6
dc.description.abstractPURPOSE: To determine the test-retest repeatability of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) measurements across institutions and MRI vendors, plus investigate the effect of post-processing methodology on measurement precision. METHODS: Thirty malignant lung lesions >2 cm in size (23 patients) were scanned on two occasions, using echo-planar-Diffusion-Weighted (DW)-MRI to derive whole-tumour ADC (b = 100, 500 and 800smm-2). Scanning was performed at 4 institutions (3 MRI vendors). Whole-tumour volumes-of-interest were copied from first visit onto second visit images and from one post-processing platform to an open-source platform, to assess ADC repeatability and cross-platform reproducibility. RESULTS: Whole-tumour ADC values ranged from 0.66-1.94x10-3mm2s-1 (mean = 1.14). Within-patient coefficient-of-variation (wCV) was 7.1% (95% CI 5.7-9.6%), limits-of-agreement (LoA) -18.0 to 21.9%. Lesions >3 cm had improved repeatability: wCV 3.9% (95% CI 2.9-5.9%); and LoA -10.2 to 11.4%. Variability for lesions <3 cm was 2.46 times higher. ADC reproducibility across different post-processing platforms was excellent: Pearson's R2 = 0.99; CoV 2.8% (95% CI 2.3-3.4%); and LoA -7.4 to 8.0%. CONCLUSION: A free-breathing DW-MRI protocol for imaging malignant lung tumours achieved satisfactory within-patient repeatability and was robust to changes in post-processing software, justifying its use in multi-centre trials. For response evaluation in individual patients, a change in ADC >21.9% will reflect treatment-related change. KEY POINTS: • In lung cancer, free-breathing DWI-MRI produces acceptable images with evaluable ADC measurement. • ADC repeatability coefficient-of-variation is 7.1% for lung tumours >2 cm. • ADC repeatability coefficient-of-variation is 3.9% for lung tumours >3 cm. • ADC measurement precision is unaffected by the post-processing software used. • In multicentre trials, 22% increase in ADC indicates positive treatment response.
dc.formatPrint-Electronic
dc.format.extent4552 - 4562
dc.languageeng
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherSPRINGER
dc.rights.urihttps://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectLung Neoplasms
dc.subjectDiagnosis, Differential
dc.subjectDiffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging
dc.subjectNeoplasm Staging
dc.subjectTumor Burden
dc.subjectProspective Studies
dc.subjectReproducibility of Results
dc.subjectROC Curve
dc.subjectAdult
dc.subjectAged
dc.subjectAged, 80 and over
dc.subjectMiddle Aged
dc.subjectFemale
dc.subjectMale
dc.titleDiffusion-weighted (DW) MRI in lung cancers: ADC test-retest repeatability.
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.dateAccepted2017-03-20
rioxxterms.funderThe Institute of Cancer Research
rioxxterms.identifier.projectUnspecified
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1007/s00330-017-4828-6
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttps://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2017-11
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review
dc.relation.isPartOfEuropean radiology
pubs.issue11
pubs.notesNot known
pubs.organisational-group/ICR
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Radiotherapy and Imaging
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Radiotherapy and Imaging/Computational Imaging
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Radiotherapy and Imaging/Magnetic Resonance
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/Royal Marsden Clinical Units
pubs.organisational-group/ICR
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Radiotherapy and Imaging
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Radiotherapy and Imaging/Computational Imaging
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Radiotherapy and Imaging/Magnetic Resonance
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/Royal Marsden Clinical Units
pubs.publication-statusPublished
pubs.volume27
pubs.embargo.termsNot known
icr.researchteamComputational Imaging
icr.researchteamMagnetic Resonance
dc.contributor.icrauthorWeller, Alexander
dc.contributor.icrauthorBlackledge, Matthew
dc.contributor.icrauthordeSouza, Nandita


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following collection(s)

Show simple item record