Clinical outcomes and survival surrogacy studies of prostate-specific antigen declines following enzalutamide in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer previously treated with docetaxel.
MetadataShow full item record
BACKGROUND: In the AFFIRM trial, enzalutamide significantly increased overall survival (OS) for men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) after chemotherapy versus placebo and significantly decreased prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels. The goal of this post hoc analysis was to associate levels of PSA decline from baseline after enzalutamide with clinical outcomes in the postchemotherapy mCRPC setting. METHODS: Men in the AFFIRM trial (n = 1199) were grouped by maximal PSA decline in the first 90 days of treatment. Kaplan-Meier estimates evaluated the association of defined PSA changes from baseline with OS, progression-free survival (PFS), radiographic PFS (rPFS), and pain response. Each PSA decline category was assessed for OS surrogacy using Prentice criteria, proportion of treatment effect explained (PTE), and proportion of variation explained. RESULTS: Men treated with enzalutamide had improved OS (hazard ratio, 0.63; P < .001) and higher rates of PSA decline (odds ratio, >19.0; P < .001) versus placebo. PSA declines of any, ≥30%, ≥50%, and ≥90% with enzalutamide were strongly associated with greater OS, PSA PFS, rPFS (P < .001), and pain response (P < .026) versus PSA increase/no decline. Any, ≥30%, and ≥50% declines in PSA resulted in the PTE range of 1.07-1.29, where treatment was no longer significant after adjustment for decline measures (P > .20). CONCLUSIONS: PSA declines of any, ≥30%, and ≥50% following enzalutamide were associated with greater clinical and pain response and improvements in PFS and OS. Surrogacy of PSA decline for OS was not fully established, possibly due to lack of PSA declines with placebo, and discordant results between PSA and imaging responses over time, and because some declines were not durable due to rapid resistance development. However, a lack of PSA decline by 90 days following enzalutamide treatment was a poor prognosis indicator in this setting. Conclusions from sensitivity analyses of maximal PSA decline from baseline over the entire treatment period are consistent with PSA declines restricted to the first 90 days. Cancer 2017;123:2303-2311. © 2017 American Cancer Society.
Version of record
metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer
Proportional Hazards Models
Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant
Prostate Cancer Targeted Therapy Group
License start date
Cancer, 2017, 123 (12), pp. 2303 - 2311
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Ki-67 and outcome in clinically localised prostate cancer: analysis of conservatively treated prostate cancer patients from the Trans-Atlantic Prostate Group study Berney, DM; Gopalan, A; Kudahetti, S; Fisher, G; Ambroisine, L; Foster, CS; Reuter, V; Eastham, J; Moller, H; Kattan, MW; Gerald, W; Cooper, C; Scardino, P; Cuzick, J; Grp, T-AP (NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP, 2009-03-17)Treatment decisions after diagnosis of clinically localised prostate cancer are difficult due to variability in tumour behaviour. We therefore examined one of the most promising biomarkers in prostate cancer, Ki-67, in a ...
Reply from Authors re: Tillmann Loch, Pat Fox Fulgham. Active Surveillance Challenges in Men with Prostate Cancer: Role of Imaging Today and Tomorrow. Eur Urol 2016;69:1034-6: Imaging in Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer: Where Should We Focus Our Research? Henderson, DR; de Souza, NM; Parker, CC; van As, NJ (2016-06)
Management of patients with advanced prostate cancer: recommendations of the St Gallen Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference (APCCC) 2015. Gillessen, S; Omlin, A; Attard, G; de Bono, JS; Efstathiou, E; Fizazi, K; Halabi, S; Nelson, PS; Sartor, O; Smith, MR; Soule, HR; Akaza, H; Beer, TM; Beltran, H; Chinnaiyan, AM; Daugaard, G; Davis, ID; De Santis, M; Drake, CG; Eeles, RA; Fanti, S; Gleave, ME; Heidenreich, A; Hussain, M; James, ND; Lecouvet, FE; Logothetis, CJ; Mastris, K; Nilsson, S; Oh, WK; Olmos, D; Padhani, AR; Parker, C; Rubin, MA; Schalken, JA; Scher, HI; Sella, A; Shore, ND; Small, EJ; Sternberg, CN; Suzuki, H; Sweeney, CJ; Tannock, IF; Tombal, B (2016-05-02)