Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorFribbens, C
dc.contributor.authorGarcia Murillas, I
dc.contributor.authorBeaney, M
dc.contributor.authorHrebien, S
dc.contributor.authorO'Leary, B
dc.contributor.authorKilburn, L
dc.contributor.authorHowarth, K
dc.contributor.authorEpstein, M
dc.contributor.authorGreen, E
dc.contributor.authorRosenfeld, N
dc.contributor.authorRing, A
dc.contributor.authorJohnston, S
dc.contributor.authorTurner, N
dc.date.accessioned2017-11-22T16:49:26Z
dc.date.issued2017-10-04
dc.identifier.citationAnnals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology, 2018, 29 (1), pp. 145 - 153
dc.identifier.issn0923-7534
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.icr.ac.uk/handle/internal/936
dc.identifier.eissn1569-8041
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/annonc/mdx483
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Selection of resistance mutations may play a major role in the development of endocrine resistance. ESR1 mutations are rare in primary breast cancer but have high prevalence in patients treated with aromatase inhibitors (AI) for advanced breast cancer. We investigated the evolution of genetic resistance to the first-line AI therapy using sequential ctDNA sampling in patients with advanced breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eighty-three patients on the first-line AI therapy for metastatic breast cancer were enrolled in a prospective study. Plasma samples were collected every 3 months to disease progression and ctDNA analysed by digital droplet PCR and enhanced tagged-amplicon sequencing (eTAm-Seq). Mutations identified in progression samples by sequencing were tracked back through samples before progression to study the evolution of mutations on therapy. The frequency of novel mutations was validated in an independent cohort of available baseline plasma samples in the Study of Faslodex versus Exemestane with or without Arimidex (SoFEA) trial, which enrolled patients with prior sensitivity to AI. RESULTS: Of the 39 patients who progressed on the first-line AI, 56.4% (22/39) had ESR1 mutations detectable at progression, which were polyclonal in 40.9% (9/22) patients. In serial tracking, ESR1 mutations were detectable median 6.7 months (95% confidence interval 3.7-NA) before clinical progression. Utilising eTAm-Seq ctDNA sequencing of progression plasma, ESR1 mutations were demonstrated to be sub-clonal in 72.2% (13/18) patients. Mutations in RAS genes were identified in 15.4% (6/39) of progressing patients (4 KRAS, 1 HRAS, 1 NRAS). In SoFEA, KRAS mutations were detected in 21.2% (24/113) patients although there was no evidence that KRAS mutation status was prognostic for progression free or overall survival. CONCLUSIONS: Cancers progressing on the first-line AI show high levels of genetic heterogeneity, with frequent sub-clonal mutations. Sub-clonal KRAS mutations are found at high frequency. The genetic diversity of AI resistant cancers may limit subsequent targeted therapy approaches.
dc.formatPrint
dc.format.extent145 - 153
dc.languageeng
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherELSEVIER
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectBreast Neoplasms
dc.subjectNeoplasm Metastasis
dc.subjectDisease Progression
dc.subjectEstrogen Receptor alpha
dc.subjectAromatase Inhibitors
dc.subjectProspective Studies
dc.subjectDrug Resistance, Neoplasm
dc.subjectMutation
dc.subjectAdult
dc.subjectAged
dc.subjectAged, 80 and over
dc.subjectMiddle Aged
dc.subjectFemale
dc.subjectProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)
dc.subjectCirculating Tumor DNA
dc.titleTracking evolution of aromatase inhibitor resistance with circulating tumour DNA analysis in metastatic breast cancer.
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.dateAccepted2017-09-01
rioxxterms.funderThe Institute of Cancer Research
rioxxterms.identifier.projectUnspecified
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1093/annonc/mdx483
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2018-01
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review
dc.relation.isPartOfAnnals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology
pubs.issue1
pubs.notesNot known
pubs.organisational-group/ICR
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Breast Cancer Research
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Breast Cancer Research/Endocrine Therapy Resistance
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Breast Cancer Research/Molecular Oncology
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Clinical Studies
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Clinical Studies/Clinical Trials & Statistics Unit
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/Royal Marsden Clinical Units
pubs.organisational-group/ICR
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Breast Cancer Research
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Breast Cancer Research/Endocrine Therapy Resistance
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Breast Cancer Research/Molecular Oncology
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Clinical Studies
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Clinical Studies/Clinical Trials & Statistics Unit
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/Royal Marsden Clinical Units
pubs.publication-statusPublished
pubs.volume29
pubs.embargo.termsNot known
icr.researchteamEndocrine Therapy Resistance
icr.researchteamMolecular Oncology
icr.researchteamClinical Trials & Statistics Unit
dc.contributor.icrauthorFribbens, Charlotte
dc.contributor.icrauthorO'Leary, Benjamin
dc.contributor.icrauthorKilburn, Lucy
dc.contributor.icrauthorTurner, Nicholas


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following collection(s)

Show simple item record

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0