Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBaker, LCJ
dc.contributor.authorBoult, JKR
dc.contributor.authorThomas, M
dc.contributor.authorKoehler, A
dc.contributor.authorNayak, T
dc.contributor.authorTessier, J
dc.contributor.authorOoi, C-H
dc.contributor.authorBirzele, F
dc.contributor.authorBelousov, A
dc.contributor.authorZajac, M
dc.contributor.authorHorn, C
dc.contributor.authorLeFave, C
dc.contributor.authorRobinson, SP
dc.date.accessioned2016-09-06T14:26:53Z
dc.date.issued2016-09-06
dc.identifier.citationBritish journal of cancer, 2016, 115 (6), pp. 691 - 702
dc.identifier.issn0007-0920
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.icr.ac.uk/handle/internal/103
dc.identifier.eissn1532-1827
dc.identifier.doi10.1038/bjc.2016.236
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: To assess antivascular effects, and evaluate clinically translatable magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) biomarkers of tumour response in vivo, following treatment with vanucizumab, a bispecific human antibody against angiopoietin-2 (Ang-2) and vascular endothelial growth factor-A (VEGF-A). METHODS: Colo205 colon cancer xenografts were imaged before and 5 days after treatment with a single 10 mg kg(-1) dose of either vanucizumab, bevacizumab (anti-human VEGF-A), LC06 (anti-murine/human Ang-2) or omalizumab (anti-human IgE control). Volumetric response was assessed using T2-weighted MRI, and diffusion-weighted, dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) and susceptibility contrast MRI used to quantify tumour water diffusivity (apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), × 10(6) mm(2) s(-1)), vascular perfusion/permeability (K(trans), min(-1)) and fractional blood volume (fBV, %) respectively. Pathological correlates were sought, and preliminary gene expression profiling performed. RESULTS: Treatment with vanucizumab, bevacizumab or LC06 induced a significant (P<0.01) cytolentic response compared with control. There was no significant change in tumour ADC in any treatment group. Uptake of Gd-DTPA was restricted to the tumour periphery in all post-treatment groups. A significant reduction in tumour K(trans) (P<0.05) and fBV (P<0.01) was determined 5 days after treatment with vanucizumab only. This was associated with a significant (P<0.05) reduction in Hoechst 33342 uptake compared with control. Gene expression profiling identified 20 human genes exclusively regulated by vanucizumab, 6 of which are known to be involved in vasculogenesis and angiogenesis. CONCLUSIONS: Vanucizumab is a promising antitumour and antiangiogenic treatment, whose antivascular activity can be monitored using DCE and susceptibility contrast MRI. Differential gene expression in vanucizumab-treated tumours is regulated by the combined effect of Ang-2 and VEGF-A inhibition.
dc.formatPrint-Electronic
dc.format.extent691 - 702
dc.languageeng
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherNATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
dc.subjectCell Line, Tumor
dc.subjectAnimals
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectMice
dc.subjectAdenocarcinoma
dc.subjectColonic Neoplasms
dc.subjectNeovascularization, Pathologic
dc.subjectAngiogenesis Inhibitors
dc.subjectAngiopoietin-2
dc.subjectVascular Endothelial Growth Factor A
dc.subjectImmunoglobulin E
dc.subjectAntibodies, Bispecific
dc.subjectAntibodies, Monoclonal
dc.subjectMagnetic Resonance Imaging
dc.subjectTumor Burden
dc.subjectXenograft Model Antitumor Assays
dc.subjectGene Expression Profiling
dc.subjectDNA Replication
dc.subjectGene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic
dc.subjectMolecular Targeted Therapy
dc.subjectAntibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized
dc.subjectBevacizumab
dc.subjectOmalizumab
dc.titleAcute tumour response to a bispecific Ang-2-VEGF-A antibody: insights from multiparametric MRI and gene expression profiling.
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.dateAccepted2016-07-06
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1038/bjc.2016.236
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2016-09
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review
dc.relation.isPartOfBritish journal of cancer
pubs.issue6
pubs.notesNo embargo
pubs.organisational-group/ICR
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Radiotherapy and Imaging
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Radiotherapy and Imaging/Magnetic Resonance
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Radiotherapy and Imaging/Pre-Clinical MRI
pubs.organisational-group/ICR
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Radiotherapy and Imaging
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Radiotherapy and Imaging/Magnetic Resonance
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Radiotherapy and Imaging/Pre-Clinical MRI
pubs.publication-statusPublished
pubs.volume115
pubs.embargo.termsNo embargo
pubs.oa-locationhttp://www.nature.com/bjc/journal/vaop/ncurrent/pdf/bjc2016236a.pdf
icr.researchteamMagnetic Resonance
icr.researchteamPre-Clinical MRI
dc.contributor.icrauthorBaker, Lauren
dc.contributor.icrauthorBoult, Jessica
dc.contributor.icrauthorRobinson, Simon


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following collection(s)

Show simple item record

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0