Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRussell, NS
dc.contributor.authorKrul, IM
dc.contributor.authorvan Eggermond, AM
dc.contributor.authorAleman, BMP
dc.contributor.authorCooke, R
dc.contributor.authorKuiper, S
dc.contributor.authorAllen, SD
dc.contributor.authorWallis, MG
dc.contributor.authorLlanas, D
dc.contributor.authorDiallo, I
dc.contributor.authorde Vathaire, F
dc.contributor.authorSmith, SA
dc.contributor.authorHauptmann, M
dc.contributor.authorBroeks, A
dc.contributor.authorSwerdlow, AJ
dc.contributor.authorVan Leeuwen, FE
dc.date.accessioned2018-04-10T08:15:33Z
dc.date.issued2017-12-01
dc.identifier.citationClinical and translational radiation oncology, 2017, 7 pp. 20 - 27
dc.identifier.issn2405-6308
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.icr.ac.uk/handle/internal/1634
dc.identifier.eissn2405-6308
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ctro.2017.09.004
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: An increased risk of breast cancer following radiotherapy for Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) has now been robustly established. In order to estimate the dose-response relationship more accurately, and to aid clinical decision making, a retrospective estimation of the radiation dose delivered to the site of the subsequent breast cancer is required. METHODS: For 174 Dutch and 170 UK female patients with breast cancer following HL treatment, the 3-dimensional position of the breast cancer in the affected breast was determined and transferred onto a CT-based anthropomorphic phantom. Using a radiotherapy treatment planning system the dose distribution on the CT-based phantom was calculated for the 46 different radiation treatment field set-ups used in the study population. The estimated dose at the centre of the breast cancer, and a margin to reflect dose uncertainty were determined on the basis of the location of the tumour and the isodose lines from the treatment planning. We assessed inter-observer variation and for 47 patients we compared the results with a previously applied dosimetry method. RESULTS: The estimated median point dose at the centre of the breast cancer location was 29.75 Gy (IQR 5.8-37.2), or about 75% of the prescribed radiotherapy dose. The median dose uncertainty range was 5.97 Gy. We observed an excellent inter-observer variation (ICC 0.89 (95% CI: 0.74-0.95)). The absolute agreement intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) for inter-method variation was 0.59 (95% CI: 0.37-0.75), indicating (nearly) good agreement. There were no systematic differences in the dose estimates between observers or methods. CONCLUSION: Estimates of the dose at the point of a subsequent breast cancer show good correlation between methods, but the retrospective nature of the estimates means that there is always some uncertainty to be accounted for.
dc.formatElectronic-eCollection
dc.format.extent20 - 27
dc.languageeng
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
dc.titleRetrospective methods to estimate radiation dose at the site of breast cancer development after Hodgkin lymphoma radiotherapy.
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.dateAccepted2017-09-16
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1016/j.ctro.2017.09.004
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2017-12
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review
dc.relation.isPartOfClinical and translational radiation oncology
pubs.notesNot known
pubs.organisational-group/ICR
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Breast Cancer Research
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Breast Cancer Research/Aetiological Epidemiology
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Genetics and Epidemiology
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Genetics and Epidemiology/Aetiological Epidemiology
pubs.organisational-group/ICR
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Breast Cancer Research
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Breast Cancer Research/Aetiological Epidemiology
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Genetics and Epidemiology
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Genetics and Epidemiology/Aetiological Epidemiology
pubs.publication-statusPublished
pubs.volume7
pubs.embargo.termsNot known
icr.researchteamAetiological Epidemiology
dc.contributor.icrauthorSwerdlow, Anthony


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following collection(s)

Show simple item record

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0