Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorOza, A
dc.contributor.authorKaye, S
dc.contributor.authorVan Tornout, J
dc.contributor.authorSessa, C
dc.contributor.authorGore, M
dc.contributor.authorNaumann, RW
dc.contributor.authorHirte, H
dc.contributor.authorColombo, N
dc.contributor.authorChen, J
dc.contributor.authorGorla, S
dc.contributor.authorPoondru, S
dc.contributor.authorSingh, M
dc.contributor.authorSteinberg, J
dc.contributor.authorYuen, G
dc.contributor.authorBanerjee, S
dc.date.accessioned2019-03-04T15:36:58Z
dc.date.issued2018-05
dc.identifier.citationGynecologic oncology, 2018, 149 (2), pp. 275 - 282
dc.identifier.issn0090-8258
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.icr.ac.uk/handle/internal/3126
dc.identifier.eissn1095-6859
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.01.019
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND:Linsitinib, an oral, dual inhibitor of insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor and insulin receptor, in combination with weekly paclitaxel, may improve clinical outcomes compared with paclitaxel alone in patients with refractory or platinum-resistant ovarian cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS:This open-label phase 1/2 clinical trial (NCT00889382) randomized patients with refractory or platinum-resistant ovarian cancer (1:1:1) to receive either oral intermittent linsitinib (600mg once daily on Days 1-3 per week) combined with paclitaxel (80mg/m2 on Days 1, 8, and 15; Arm A) or continuous linsitinib (150mg twice daily) in combination with paclitaxel (Arm B), or paclitaxel alone (Arm C). Primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS); secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), overall response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and safety/tolerability. RESULTS:A total of 152 women were randomized to treatment (n=51 Arm A; n=51 Arm B, n=50 Arm C). In combination with paclitaxel, neither intermittent linsitinib (median PFS 2.8months; 95% confidence interval [CI]:2.5-4.4) nor continuous linsitinib (median PFS 4.2months; 95% CI:2.8-5.1) improved PFS over weekly paclitaxel alone (median PFS 5.6months; 95% CI:3.2-6.9). No improvement in ORR, DCR, or OS in either linsitinib dosing schedule was observed compared with paclitaxel alone. Adverse event (AE) rates, including all-grade and grade 3/4 treatment-related AEs, and treatment-related AEs leading to discontinuation, were higher among patients receiving intermittent linsitinib compared with the other treatment arms. CONCLUSION:Addition of intermittent or continuous linsitinib with paclitaxel did not improve outcomes in patients with platinum-resistant/refractory ovarian cancer compared with paclitaxel alone.
dc.formatPrint-Electronic
dc.format.extent275 - 282
dc.languageeng
dc.language.isoeng
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectNeoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial
dc.subjectOvarian Neoplasms
dc.subjectNeoplasm Recurrence, Local
dc.subjectPaclitaxel
dc.subjectOrganoplatinum Compounds
dc.subjectImidazoles
dc.subjectPyrazines
dc.subjectAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
dc.subjectTreatment Outcome
dc.subjectDrug Administration Schedule
dc.subjectDrug Resistance, Neoplasm
dc.subjectAdolescent
dc.subjectAdult
dc.subjectAged
dc.subjectMiddle Aged
dc.subjectFemale
dc.subjectYoung Adult
dc.subjectCarcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial
dc.titlePhase 2 study evaluating intermittent and continuous linsitinib and weekly paclitaxel in patients with recurrent platinum resistant ovarian epithelial cancer.
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.dateAccepted2018-01-19
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.01.019
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2018-05
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review
dc.relation.isPartOfGynecologic oncology
pubs.issue2
pubs.notesNot known
pubs.organisational-group/ICR
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Closed research teams
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Closed research teams/Medicine Drug Development Unit (Kaye)
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/Royal Marsden Clinical Units
pubs.organisational-group/ICR
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Closed research teams
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Closed research teams/Medicine Drug Development Unit (Kaye)
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/Royal Marsden Clinical Units
pubs.publication-statusPublished
pubs.volume149
pubs.embargo.termsNot known
icr.researchteamMedicine Drug Development Unit (Kaye)en_US
dc.contributor.icrauthorGore, Martin
dc.contributor.icrauthorBanerjee, Susana
dc.contributor.icrauthorKaye, Stanley Bernard


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following collection(s)

Show simple item record

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0