Trial Design and Objectives for Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: Updated Recommendations From the Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials Working Group 3.

View/ Open
Date
2016-04-20ICR Author
Author
Scher, HI
Morris, MJ
Stadler, WM
Higano, C
Basch, E
Fizazi, K
Antonarakis, ES
Beer, TM
Carducci, MA
Chi, KN
Corn, PG
de Bono, JS
Dreicer, R
George, DJ
Heath, EI
Hussain, M
Kelly, WK
Liu, G
Logothetis, C
Nanus, D
Stein, MN
Rathkopf, DE
Slovin, SF
Ryan, CJ
Sartor, O
Small, EJ
Smith, MR
Sternberg, CN
Taplin, M-E
Wilding, G
Nelson, PS
Schwartz, LH
Halabi, S
Kantoff, PW
Armstrong, AJ
Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials Working Group 3,
Type
Journal Article
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
PURPOSE: Evolving treatments, disease phenotypes, and biology, together with a changing drug development environment, have created the need to revise castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) clinical trial recommendations to succeed those from prior Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials Working Groups. METHODS: An international expert committee of prostate cancer clinical investigators (the Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials Working Group 3 [PCWG3]) was reconvened and expanded and met in 2012-2015 to formulate updated criteria on the basis of emerging trial data and validation studies of the Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials Working Group 2 recommendations. RESULTS: PCWG3 recommends that baseline patient assessment include tumor histology, detailed records of prior systemic treatments and responses, and a detailed reporting of disease subtypes based on an anatomic pattern of metastatic spread. New recommendations for trial outcome measures include the time to event end point of symptomatic skeletal events, as well as time to first metastasis and time to progression for trials in the nonmetastatic CRPC state. PCWG3 introduces the concept of no longer clinically benefiting to underscore the distinction between first evidence of progression and the clinical need to terminate or change treatment, and the importance of documenting progression in existing lesions as distinct from the development of new lesions. Serial biologic profiling using tumor samples from biopsies, blood-based diagnostics, and/or imaging is also recommended to gain insight into mechanisms of resistance and to identify predictive biomarkers of sensitivity for use in prospective trials. CONCLUSION: PCWG3 moves drug development closer to unmet needs in clinical practice by focusing on disease manifestations most likely to affect prognosis adversely for therapeutics tested in both nonmetastatic and metastatic CRPC populations. Consultation with regulatory authorities is recommended if a trial is intended to seek support for drug approval.
Collections
Subject
Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials Working Group 3
Humans
Disease Progression
Genetic Predisposition to Disease
Kallikreins
Prostate-Specific Antigen
Antineoplastic Agents
Diagnostic Imaging
Biopsy
Disease-Free Survival
Treatment Outcome
Molecular Diagnostic Techniques
Risk Assessment
Risk Factors
Predictive Value of Tests
Drug Approval
Consensus
Drug Resistance, Neoplasm
Phenotype
Research Design
Time Factors
Male
Clinical Trials as Topic
Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant
Surveys and Questionnaires
Biomarkers, Tumor
Research team
Prostate Cancer Targeted Therapy Group
Language
eng
License start date
2016-04
Citation
Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2016, 34 (12), pp. 1402 - 1418
Publisher
LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Local Failure Events in Prostate Cancer Treated with Radiotherapy: A Pooled Analysis of 18 Randomized Trials from the Meta-analysis of Randomized Trials in Cancer of the Prostate Consortium (LEVIATHAN).
Ma, TM; Chu, F-I; Sandler, H; Feng, FY; Efstathiou, JA; et al. (ELSEVIER, 2022-08-04)CONTEXT: The prognostic importance of local failure after definitive radiotherapy (RT) in National Comprehensive Cancer Network intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer (PCa) patients remains unclear. OBJECTIVE: To ... -
Toxicity and Patient-Reported Outcomes of a Phase 2 Randomized Trial of Prostate and Pelvic Lymph Node Versus Prostate only Radiotherapy in Advanced Localised Prostate Cancer (PIVOTAL).
Dearnaley, D; Griffin, CL; Lewis, R; Mayles, P; Mayles, H; et al. (ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC, 2019-03-01)PURPOSE: To establish the toxicity profile of high-dose pelvic lymph node intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and to assess whether it is safely deliverable at multiple centers. METHODS AND MATERIALS: In this phase ... -
PIVOTALboost: A phase III randomised controlled trial of prostate and pelvis versus prostate alone radiotherapy with or without prostate boost (CRUK/16/018).
Syndikus, I; Cruickshank, C; Staffurth, J; Tree, A; Henry, A; et al. (ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD, 2020-11-01)•PIVOTALboost evaluates benefits/toxicity of pelvic node RT and focal boost dose escalation.•Unfavourable intermediate/high risk and bulky local disease are most likely to benefit.•Functional MRI imaging is used to select ...