Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGurney-Champion, OJ
dc.contributor.authorCollins, DJ
dc.contributor.authorWetscherek, A
dc.contributor.authorRata, M
dc.contributor.authorKlaassen, R
dc.contributor.authorvan Laarhoven, HWM
dc.contributor.authorHarrington, KJ
dc.contributor.authorOelfke, U
dc.contributor.authorOrton, MR
dc.date.accessioned2019-05-03T15:23:26Z
dc.date.issued2019-04-09
dc.identifier.citationPhysics in medicine and biology, 2019, 64 (10), pp. 105015 - ?
dc.identifier.issn0031-9155
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.icr.ac.uk/handle/internal/3219
dc.identifier.eissn1361-6560
dc.identifier.doi10.1088/1361-6560/ab1786
dc.description.abstractDespite the utility of tumour characterisation using quantitative parameter maps from multi-b-value diffusion-weighted MRI (DWI), clinicians often prefer the use of the image with highest diffusion-weighting (b-value), for instance for defining regions of interest (ROIs). However, these images are typically degraded by noise, as they do not utilize the information from the full acquisition. We present a principal component analysis (PCA) approach for model-free denoising of DWI data. PCA-denoising was compared to synthetic MRI, where a diffusion model is fitted for each voxel and a denoised image at a given b-value is generated from the model fit. A quantitative comparison of systematic and random errors was performed on data simulated using several diffusion models (mono-exponential, bi-exponential, stretched-exponential and kurtosis). A qualitative visual comparison was also performed for in vivo images in six healthy volunteers and three pancreatic cancer patients. In simulations, the reduction in random errors from PCA-denoising was substantial (up to 55%) and similar to synthetic MRI (up to 53%). Model-based synthetic MRI denoising resulted in substantial (up to 29% of signal) systematic errors, whereas PCA-denoising was able to denoise without introducing systematic errors (less than 2%). In vivo, the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and sharpness of PCA-denoised images were superior to synthetic MRI, resulting in clearer tumour boundaries. In the presence of motion, PCA-denoising did not cause image blurring, unlike image averaging or synthetic MRI. Multi-b-value MRI can be denoised model-free with our PCA-denoising strategy that reduces noise to a level similar to synthetic MRI, but without introducing systematic errors associated with the synthetic MRI method.
dc.formatElectronic
dc.format.extent105015 - ?
dc.languageeng
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherIOP PUBLISHING LTD
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectPancreatic Neoplasms
dc.subjectDiffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging
dc.subjectCase-Control Studies
dc.subjectMovement
dc.subjectAlgorithms
dc.subjectPrincipal Component Analysis
dc.subjectImage Processing, Computer-Assisted
dc.subjectSignal-To-Noise Ratio
dc.subjectHealthy Volunteers
dc.titlePrincipal component analysis fosr fast and model-free denoising of multi b-value diffusion-weighted MR images.
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.dateAccepted2019-04-09
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1088/1361-6560/ab1786
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2019-05-17
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review
dc.relation.isPartOfPhysics in medicine and biology
pubs.issue10
pubs.notesNo embargo
pubs.organisational-group/ICR
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Cancer Biology
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Cancer Biology/Targeted Therapy
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Radiotherapy and Imaging
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Radiotherapy and Imaging/Radiotherapy Physics Modelling
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Radiotherapy and Imaging/Targeted Therapy
pubs.organisational-group/ICR
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Cancer Biology
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Cancer Biology/Targeted Therapy
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Radiotherapy and Imaging
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Radiotherapy and Imaging/Radiotherapy Physics Modelling
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Radiotherapy and Imaging/Targeted Therapy
pubs.publication-statusPublished
pubs.volume64
pubs.embargo.termsNo embargo
icr.researchteamRadiotherapy Physics Modelling
icr.researchteamTargeted Therapy
dc.contributor.icrauthorGurney-Champion, Oliver
dc.contributor.icrauthorCollins, David
dc.contributor.icrauthorWetscherek, Andreas
dc.contributor.icrauthorHarrington, Kevin


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following collection(s)

Show simple item record

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0