Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBuus, R
dc.contributor.authorSestak, I
dc.contributor.authorBarron, S
dc.contributor.authorLoughman, T
dc.contributor.authorFender, B
dc.contributor.authorRuiz, CL
dc.contributor.authorDynoodt, P
dc.contributor.authorWang, C-JA
dc.contributor.authorO'Leary, D
dc.contributor.authorGallagher, WM
dc.contributor.authorDowsett, M
dc.contributor.authorCuzick, J
dc.date.accessioned2019-11-12T12:47:47Z
dc.date.issued2020-02-01
dc.identifier.citationClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2020, 26 (3), pp. 623 - 631
dc.identifier.issn1078-0432
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.icr.ac.uk/handle/internal/3408
dc.identifier.eissn1557-3265
dc.identifier.doi10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-19-0712
dc.description.abstractPURPOSE: To test the validity of OncoMasTR Molecular Score (OMm), OMclin1, and OncoMasTR Risk Score (OMclin2) prognostic scores for prediction of distant recurrence (DR) in estrogen receptor (ER)-positive/HER2-negative breast cancer treated with 5 years' endocrine therapy only and compare their performance with the Oncotype DX Recurrence Score (RS). EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: OMm incorporates three master transcription regulator genes. OMclin1 combines OMm, tumor size, grade, and nodal status; OMclin2 incorporates OMm, tumor size, and nodal status. OMclin1 and OMclin2 were evaluated for 646 postmenopausal patients with ER-positive/HER2-negative primary breast cancer with 0-3 involved lymph nodes in TransATAC. Patients were randomized to 5 years' anastrozole or tamoxifen without chemotherapy. RS was available in all cases. We used likelihood ratio-χ 2, C-index, and Kaplan-Meier analyses to assess prognostic information. RESULTS: OMm, OMclin1, and OMclin2 were highly prognostic for prediction of DR in years 0-10 among all patients [likelihood ratio (LR)-χ 2 = 25.4, 48.7, and 45.0, respectively, all P < 0.001; C-index = 0.67, 0.71, and 0.71, respectively], compared with RS (LR-χ 2 = 18.8; P < 0.001; C-index = 0.63). All three scores provided significant additional prognostic value beyond clinical treatment score, Nottingham Prognostic Index, and Ki67. OMclin1 and OMclin2 categorized 190 and 267 node-negative patients as low risk (DR rates: 2.9% and 4.9%, respectively). In comparison, RS categorized 296 node-negative patients as low-risk and 128 patients as intermediate-risk (DR rate: 6.6% and 17.3%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: OMm, OMclin1, and OMclin2 were highly prognostic for early and late DR in women with early-stage ER-positive breast cancer receiving 5 years' endocrine therapy. In TransATAC, OMclin1 and the OncoMasTR Risk Score (OMclin2) were superior to RS in identifying patients at increased risk of DR.
dc.formatPrint-Electronic
dc.format.extent623 - 631
dc.languageeng
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherAMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
dc.rights.urihttps://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserved
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectBreast Neoplasms
dc.subjectNeoplasm Recurrence, Local
dc.subjectDisease Progression
dc.subjectTamoxifen
dc.subjectReceptor, erbB-2
dc.subjectEstrogen Receptor alpha
dc.subjectReceptors, Progesterone
dc.subjectAntineoplastic Agents, Hormonal
dc.subjectNeoplasm Staging
dc.subjectPrognosis
dc.subjectSurvival Rate
dc.subjectGene Expression Profiling
dc.subjectDrug Resistance, Neoplasm
dc.subjectAged
dc.subjectMiddle Aged
dc.subjectFemale
dc.subjectKruppel-Like Transcription Factors
dc.subjectNeoplasm Grading
dc.subjectSecurin
dc.subjectBiomarkers, Tumor
dc.subjectForkhead Box Protein M1
dc.subjectAnastrozole
dc.titleValidation of the OncoMasTR Risk Score in Estrogen Receptor-Positive/HER2-Negative Patients: A TransATAC study.
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.dateAccepted2019-10-18
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-19-0712
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttps://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserved
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2020-02
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review
dc.relation.isPartOfClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research
pubs.issue3
pubs.notesNot known
pubs.organisational-group/ICR
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Breast Cancer Research
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Breast Cancer Research/Endocrinology
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Molecular Pathology
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Molecular Pathology/Endocrinology
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Molecular Pathology/Endocrinology/Endocrinology (hon.)
pubs.organisational-group/ICR
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Breast Cancer Research
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Breast Cancer Research/Endocrinology
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Molecular Pathology
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Molecular Pathology/Endocrinology
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Molecular Pathology/Endocrinology/Endocrinology (hon.)
pubs.publication-statusPublished
pubs.volume26
pubs.embargo.termsNot known
icr.researchteamEndocrinology
dc.contributor.icrauthorBuus, Richard


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following collection(s)

Show simple item record