Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHussain, SA
dc.contributor.authorPorta, N
dc.contributor.authorHall, E
dc.contributor.authorSalawu, A
dc.contributor.authorLewis, R
dc.contributor.authorSreenivasan, T
dc.contributor.authorWallace, J
dc.contributor.authorCrundwell, M
dc.contributor.authorJenkins, P
dc.contributor.authorTremlett, J
dc.contributor.authorHuddart, R
dc.contributor.authorJames, ND
dc.contributor.authorBC2001 Investigators,
dc.date.accessioned2021-01-08T16:20:53Z
dc.date.issued2021-02-01
dc.identifier.citationEuropean urology, 2021, 79 (2), pp. 307 - 315
dc.identifier.issn0302-2838
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.icr.ac.uk/handle/internal/4270
dc.identifier.eissn1873-7560
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.eururo.2020.11.036
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: BC2001 demonstrated improved local control with the addition of chemotherapy to radiotherapy in 360 patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer. OBJECTIVE: To establish whether such benefit remained in BC2001 patients who received prior neoadjuvant chemotherapy. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A total of 117 patients (33%) received neoadjuvant chemotherapy and were randomised to radiotherapy with (48%) or without (52%) concomitant chemotherapy. Patients were recruited between August 2001 and April 2008 from 28 UK centres. INTERVENTION: Platinum-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy, followed by radiotherapy with (cRT) or without (RT) synchronous 5-fluorouracil and mitomycin-C. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Toxicity, locoregional control (LRC), overall survival (OS), and quality of life (QoL) were measured. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Of the patients, 74% received gemcitabine plus cisplatin or carboplatin. Compliance rates with full-dose radiotherapy were cRT 93% and RT 92%. An excess of grade ≥3 toxicities while on (chemo)radiation occurred for cRT 33% versus RT 22%, although nonstatistically significant (p = 0.16). With 110 mo median follow-up for survival (interquartile range 96-123), cRT showed improved LRC though not statistically significant (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] = 0.64, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.33-1.23, p = 0.18). No differences in OS (aHR = 0.95, 95% CI 0.57-1.57, p = 0.8) were observed. No significant detriment in QoL was observed between cRT and RT in this subgroup of patients. CONCLUSIONS: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy does not compromise the delivery of radical curative treatment. Although underpowered due to a small sample size, the benefit of chemoradiotherapy to improve local control in this group of patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy is consistent with that observed in the main trial. Although a nonsignificant excess of toxicity was observed, there was no evidence of impaired QoL. PATIENT SUMMARY: Chemotherapy before radical chemo(radiotherapy) is feasible and well tolerated.
dc.formatPrint-Electronic
dc.format.extent307 - 315
dc.languageeng
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherELSEVIER
dc.subjectBC2001 Investigators
dc.titleOutcomes in Patients with Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer Treated with Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Followed by (Chemo)radiotherapy in the BC2001 Trial.
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.dateAccepted2020-11-19
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1016/j.eururo.2020.11.036
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2021-02
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review
dc.relation.isPartOfEuropean urology
pubs.issue2
pubs.notesNot known
pubs.organisational-group/ICR
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Clinical Studies
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Clinical Studies/Clinical Trials & Statistics Unit
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Clinical Studies/ICR-CTSU Urology and Head and Neck Trials Team
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Radiotherapy and Imaging
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Radiotherapy and Imaging/Clinical Academic Radiotherapy (Huddart)
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Radiotherapy and Imaging/Prostate and Bladder Cancer Research
pubs.publication-statusAccepted
pubs.volume79
pubs.embargo.termsNot known
icr.researchteamClinical Trials & Statistics Unit
icr.researchteamICR-CTSU Urology and Head and Neck Trials Team
icr.researchteamClinical Academic Radiotherapy (Huddart)
icr.researchteamProstate and Bladder Cancer Research
dc.contributor.icrauthorPorta, Nuria
dc.contributor.icrauthorHall, Emma
dc.contributor.icrauthorLewis, Rebecca
dc.contributor.icrauthorHuddart, Robert
dc.contributor.icrauthorJames, Nicholas


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following collection(s)

Show simple item record