Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHe, Y
dc.contributor.authorZhang, X
dc.contributor.authorTimofeeva, M
dc.contributor.authorFarrington, SM
dc.contributor.authorLi, X
dc.contributor.authorXu, W
dc.contributor.authorCampbell, H
dc.contributor.authorHoulston, RS
dc.contributor.authorTomlinson, IP
dc.contributor.authorTheodoratou, E
dc.contributor.authorDunlop, MG
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-25T13:04:05Z
dc.date.available2021-11-25T13:04:05Z
dc.date.issued2021-08-27
dc.identifier.citationInternational journal of cancer, 2021en_US
dc.identifier.issn0020-7136
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.icr.ac.uk/handle/internal/4897
dc.identifier.eissn1097-0215en_US
dc.identifier.eissn1097-0215
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/ijc.33779en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/ijc.33779
dc.description.abstractEpidemiological evidence is consistent with a protective effect of vitamin D against colorectal cancer (CRC), but the observed strong associations are open to confounders and potential reverse causation. Previous Mendelian randomisation (MR) studies were limited by poor genetic instruments and inadequate statistical power. Moreover, whether genetically higher CRC risk can influence vitamin D level, namely the reverse causation, still remains unknown. Herein, we report the first bidirectional MR study. We employed 110 newly identified genetic variants as proxies for vitamin D to obtain unconfounded effect estimates on CRC risk in 26 397 CRC cases and 41 481 controls of European ancestry. To test for reserve causation, we estimated effects of 115 CRC-risk variants on vitamin D level among 417 580 participants from the UK Biobank. The causal association was estimated using the random-effect inverse-variance weighted (IVW) method. We found no significant causal effect of vitamin D on CRC risk [IVW estimate odds ratio: 0.97, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.88-1.07, P = .565]. Similarly, no significant reverse causal association was identified between genetically increased CRC risk and vitamin D levels (IVW estimate β: -0.002, 95% CI = -0.008 to 0.004, P = .543). Stratified analysis by tumour sites did not identify significant causal associations in either direction between vitamin D and colon or rectal cancer. Despite the improved statistical power of this study, we found no evidence of causal association of either direction between circulating vitamin D and CRC risk. Significant associations reported by observational studies may be primarily driven by unidentified confounders.en_US
dc.formatPrint-Electronicen_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_US
dc.titleBidirectional Mendelian randomisation analysis of the relationship between circulating vitamin D concentration and colorectal cancer risk.en_US
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.dateAccepted2021-08-02
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_US
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1002/ijc.33779en_US
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2021-08-27
dc.relation.isPartOfInternational journal of canceren_US
pubs.notesNot knownen_US
pubs.organisational-group/ICR
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Genetics and Epidemiology
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Genetics and Epidemiology/Cancer Genomics
pubs.publication-statusPublisheden_US
pubs.embargo.termsNot knownen_US
icr.researchteamCancer Genomics
dc.contributor.icrauthorHoulston, Richarden_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/