Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAuner, HW
dc.contributor.authorBrown, SR
dc.contributor.authorWalker, K
dc.contributor.authorKendall, J
dc.contributor.authorDawkins, B
dc.contributor.authorMeads, D
dc.contributor.authorMorgan, GJ
dc.contributor.authorKaiser, MF
dc.contributor.authorCook, M
dc.contributor.authorRoberts, S
dc.contributor.authorParrish, C
dc.contributor.authorCook, G
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-19T11:30:27Z
dc.date.available2022-04-19T11:30:27Z
dc.date.issued2022-04-01
dc.identifier.citationBlood cancer journal, 2022, 12 (4), pp. 52 - ?
dc.identifier.issn2044-5385
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.icr.ac.uk/handle/internal/5090
dc.identifier.eissn2044-5385
dc.identifier.eissn2044-5385
dc.identifier.doi10.1038/s41408-022-00626-4
dc.identifier.doi10.1038/s41408-022-00626-4
dc.description.abstractThe all-oral combination of ixazomib, cyclophosphamide, and dexamethasone (ICD) is well tolerated and effective in newly diagnosed and relapsed multiple myeloma (MM). We carried out MUKeight, a randomised, controlled, open, parallel group, multi-centre phase II trial in patients with relapsed MM after prior treatment with thalidomide, lenalidomide, and a proteasome inhibitor (ISRCTN58227268), with the primary objective to test whether ICD has improved clinical activity compared to cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone (CD) in terms of progression-free survival (PFS). Between January 2016 and December 2018, 112 participants were randomised between ICD (n = 58) and CD (n = 54) in 33 UK centres. Patients had a median age of 70 years and had received a median of four prior lines of therapy. 74% were classed as frail. Median PFS in the ICD arm was 5.6 months, compared to 6.7 months with CD (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.21, 80% CI 0.9-1.6, p = 0.3634). Response rates and overall survival were not significantly different between ICD and CD. Dose modifications or omissions, and serious adverse events (SAEs), occurred more often in the ICD arm. In summary, the addition of ixazomib to cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone did not improve outcomes in the comparatively frail patients enroled in the MUKeight trial.
dc.formatElectronic
dc.format.extent52 - ?
dc.languageeng
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherSPRINGERNATURE
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectMultiple Myeloma
dc.subjectBoron Compounds
dc.subjectCyclophosphamide
dc.subjectDexamethasone
dc.subjectGlycine
dc.subjectAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
dc.subjectAged
dc.titleIxazomib with cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone in relapsed or refractory myeloma: MUKeight phase II randomised controlled trial results.
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.dateAccepted2022-01-24
rioxxterms.versionVoR
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1038/s41408-022-00626-4
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
dc.relation.isPartOfBlood cancer journal
pubs.issue4
pubs.notesNo embargo
pubs.organisational-group/ICR
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Genetics and Epidemiology
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Genetics and Epidemiology/Myeloma Molecular Therapy
pubs.publication-statusPublished
pubs.volume12
pubs.embargo.termsNo embargo
icr.researchteamMyeloma Molecular Therapy
dc.contributor.icrauthorKaiser, Martin


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following collection(s)

Show simple item record

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/