Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorYong, KL
dc.contributor.authorHinsley, S
dc.contributor.authorAuner, HW
dc.contributor.authorBygrave, C
dc.contributor.authorKaiser, MF
dc.contributor.authorRamasamy, K
dc.contributor.authorDe Tute, RM
dc.contributor.authorSherratt, D
dc.contributor.authorFlanagan, L
dc.contributor.authorGarg, M
dc.contributor.authorHawkins, S
dc.contributor.authorWilliams, C
dc.contributor.authorCavenagh, J
dc.contributor.authorRabin, NK
dc.contributor.authorCroft, J
dc.contributor.authorMorgan, G
dc.contributor.authorDavies, F
dc.contributor.authorOwen, RG
dc.contributor.authorBrown, SR
dc.coverage.spatialItaly
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-02T09:58:33Z
dc.date.available2022-09-02T09:58:33Z
dc.date.issued2021-10-01
dc.identifier.citationHaematologica: the hematology journal, 2021, 106 (10), pp. 2694 - 2706en_US
dc.identifier.issn0390-6078
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.icr.ac.uk/handle/internal/5382
dc.identifier.eissn1592-8721
dc.identifier.eissn1592-8721
dc.identifier.doi10.3324/haematol.2021.278399
dc.description.abstractThe proteasome inhibitors, carfilzomib and bortezomib, are widely used to treat myeloma but head-to-head comparisons have produced conflicting results. We compared the activity of these proteasome inhibitors in combination with cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone (KCd vs. VCd) in second-line treatment using fixed duration therapy and evaluated the efficacy of carfilzomib maintenance. MUKfive was a phase II controlled, parallel group trial that randomized patients (2:1) to KCd (n=201) or VCd (n=99); responding patients on carfilzomib were randomized to maintenance carfilzomib (n=69) or no further treatment (n=72). Primary endpoints were: (i) very good partial response (non-inferiority, odds ratio [OR] 0.8) at 24 weeks, and (ii) progression-free survival. More participants achieved a very good partial response or better with carfilzomib than with bortezomib (40.2% vs. 31.9%, OR=1.48, 90% confidence interval [CI]: 0.95, 2.31; non-inferior), with a trend for particular benefit in patients with adverse-risk disease. KCd was associated with higher overall response (partial response or better, 84.0% vs. 68.1%, OR=2.72, 90% CI: 1.62, 4.55, P=0.001). Neuropathy (grade ≥3 or ≥2 with pain) was more common with bortezomib (19.8% vs. 1.5%, P<0.0001), while grade ≥3 cardiac events and hypertension were only reported in the KCd arm (3.6% each). The median progression-free survival in the KCd arm was 11.7 months vs. 10.2 months in the VCd arm (hazard ratio [HR]=0.95, 80% CI: 0.77, 1.18). Carfilzomib maintenance was associated with longer progression-free survival, median 11.9 months vs. 5.6 months for no maintenance (HR 0.59, 80% CI: 0.46-0.77, P=0.0086). When used as fixed duration therapy in first relapase, KCd is at least as effective as VCd, and carfilzomib is an effective maintenance agent. This trial was registered with International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number (ISRCTN) identifier: ISRCTN17354232.
dc.formatElectronic
dc.format.extent2694 - 2706
dc.languageeng
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherFERRATA STORTI FOUNDATIONen_US
dc.relation.ispartofHaematologica: the hematology journal
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0en_US
dc.subjectAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
dc.subjectBortezomib
dc.subjectCyclophosphamide
dc.subjectDexamethasone
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectMultiple Myeloma
dc.subjectOligopeptides
dc.titleCarfilzomib or bortezomib in combination with cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone followed by carfilzomib maintenance for patients with multiple myeloma after one prior therapy: results from a multicenter, phase II, randomized, controlled trial (MUKfive).en_US
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.dateAccepted2021-04-14
dc.date.updated2022-09-02T09:57:33Z
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_US
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.3324/haematol.2021.278399en_US
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2021-10-01
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_US
pubs.author-urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33910333
pubs.issue10
pubs.organisational-group/ICR
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Genetics and Epidemiology
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Genetics and Epidemiology/Myeloma Molecular Therapy
pubs.publication-statusPublished online
pubs.publisher-urlhttp://dx.doi.org/10.3324/haematol.2021.278399
pubs.volume106
icr.researchteamMyeloma Molecular Therapyen_US
dc.contributor.icrauthorKaiser, Martin
icr.provenanceDeposited by Mr Arek Surman on 2022-09-02. Deposit type is initial. No. of files: 1. Files: 10255-Article Text-75341-2-10-20210929.pdf


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following collection(s)

Show simple item record

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0