Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGray, V
dc.contributor.authorBriggs, S
dc.contributor.authorPalles, C
dc.contributor.authorJaeger, E
dc.contributor.authorIveson, T
dc.contributor.authorKerr, R
dc.contributor.authorSaunders, MP
dc.contributor.authorPaul, J
dc.contributor.authorHarkin, A
dc.contributor.authorMcQueen, J
dc.contributor.authorSummers, MG
dc.contributor.authorJohnstone, E
dc.contributor.authorWang, H
dc.contributor.authorGatcombe, L
dc.contributor.authorMaughan, TS
dc.contributor.authorKaplan, R
dc.contributor.authorEscott-Price, V
dc.contributor.authorAl-Tassan, NA
dc.contributor.authorMeyer, BF
dc.contributor.authorWakil, SM
dc.contributor.authorHoulston, RS
dc.contributor.authorCheadle, JP
dc.contributor.authorTomlinson, I
dc.contributor.authorChurch, DN
dc.coverage.spatialUnited States
dc.date.accessioned2023-08-01T14:20:03Z
dc.date.available2023-08-01T14:20:03Z
dc.date.issued2019-08-01
dc.identifierARTN djy215
dc.identifier5289445
dc.identifier.citationJournal of the National Cancer Institute, 2019, 111 (8), pp. 828 - 836
dc.identifier.issn0027-8874
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.icr.ac.uk/handle/internal/5908
dc.identifier.eissn1460-2105
dc.identifier.eissn1460-2105
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/jnci/djy215
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Constitutional loss of function (LOF) single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in pattern recognition receptors FPR1, TLR3, and TLR4 have previously been reported to predict oxaliplatin benefit in colorectal cancer. Confirmation of this association could substantially improve patient stratification. METHODS: We performed a retrospective biomarker analysis of the Short Course in Oncology Therapy (SCOT) and COIN/COIN-B trials. Participant status for LOF variants in FPR1 (rs867228), TLR3 (rs3775291), and TLR4 (rs4986790/rs4986791) was determined by genotyping array or genotype imputation. Associations between LOF variants and disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed by Cox regression, adjusted for confounders, using additive, dominant, and recessive genetic models. All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS: Our validation study populations included 2929 and 1948 patients in the SCOT and COIN/COIN-B cohorts, respectively, of whom 2728 and 1672 patients had functional status of all three SNPs determined. We found no evidence of an association between any SNP and DFS in the SCOT cohort, or with OS in either cohort, irrespective of the type of model used. This included models for which an association was previously reported for rs867228 (recessive model, multivariable-adjusted hazard ratio [HR] for DFS in SCOT = 1.19, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.99 to 1.45, P = .07; HR for OS in COIN/COIN-B = 0.92, 95% CI = 0.63 to 1.34, P = .66), and rs4986790 (dominant model, multivariable-adjusted HR for DFS in SCOT = 0.86, 95% CI = 0.65 to 1.13, P = .27; HR for OS in COIN/COIN-B = 1.08, 95% CI = 0.90 to 1.31, P = .40). CONCLUSION: In this prespecified analysis of two large clinical trials, we found no evidence that constitutional LOF SNPs in FPR1, TLR3, or TLR4 are associated with differential benefit from oxaliplatin. Our results suggest these SNPs are unlikely to be clinically useful biomarkers.
dc.formatPrint
dc.format.extent828 - 836
dc.languageeng
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherOXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of the National Cancer Institute
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subjectAdult
dc.subjectAged
dc.subjectAged, 80 and over
dc.subjectAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
dc.subjectBiomarkers, Tumor
dc.subjectColorectal Neoplasms
dc.subjectDisease-Free Survival
dc.subjectFemale
dc.subjectGenotype
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectMale
dc.subjectMiddle Aged
dc.subjectOxaliplatin
dc.subjectPolymorphism, Genetic
dc.subjectPolymorphism, Single Nucleotide
dc.subjectReceptors, Formyl Peptide
dc.subjectReceptors, Pattern Recognition
dc.subjectToll-Like Receptor 3
dc.subjectToll-Like Receptor 4
dc.titlePattern Recognition Receptor Polymorphisms as Predictors of Oxaliplatin Benefit in Colorectal Cancer.
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.dateAccepted2018-11-19
dc.date.updated2023-08-01T14:19:34Z
rioxxterms.versionVoR
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1093/jnci/djy215
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2019-08-01
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review
pubs.author-urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30649440
pubs.issue8
pubs.organisational-group/ICR
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Genetics and Epidemiology
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Genetics and Epidemiology/Cancer Genomics
pubs.publication-statusPublished
pubs.publisher-urlhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djy215
pubs.volume111
icr.researchteamCancer Genomics
dc.contributor.icrauthorHoulston, Richard
icr.provenanceDeposited by Mr Arek Surman (impersonating Prof Richard Houlston) on 2023-08-01. Deposit type is initial. No. of files: 1. Files: Pattern Recognition Receptor Polymorphisms as Predictors of Oxaliplatin Benefit in Colorectal Cancer.pdf


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following collection(s)

Show simple item record

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/