A randomised assessment of image guided radiotherapy within a phase 3 trial of conventional or hypofractionated high dose intensity modulated radiotherapy for prostate cancer.
MetadataShow full item record
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE:Image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) improves treatment set-up accuracy and provides the opportunity to reduce target volume margins. We introduced IGRT methods using standard (IGRT-S) or reduced (IGRT-R) margins in a randomised phase 2 substudy within CHHiP trial. We present a pre-planned analysis of the impact of IGRT on dosimetry and acute/late pelvic side effects using gastrointestinal and genitourinary clinician and patient-reported outcomes (PRO) and evaluate efficacy. MATERIALS AND METHODS:CHHiP is a randomised phase 3, non-inferiority trial for men with localised prostate cancer. 3216 patients were randomly assigned to conventional (74 Gy in 2 Gy/fraction (f) daily) or moderate hypofractionation (60 or 57 Gy in 3 Gy/f daily) between October 2002 and June 2011. The IGRT substudy included a second randomisation assigning to no-IGRT, IGRT-S (standard CTV-PTV margins), or IGRT-R (reduced CTV-PTV margins). Primary substudy endpoint was late RTOG bowel and urinary toxicity at 2 years post-radiotherapy. RESULTS:Between June 2010 to July 2011, 293 men were recruited from 16 centres. Median follow-up is 56.9(IQR 54.3-60.9) months. Rectal and bladder dose-volume and surface percentages were significantly lower in IGRT-R compared to IGRT-S group; (p < 0.0001). Cumulative proportion with RTOG grade ≥ 2 toxicity reported to 2 years for bowel was 8.3(95% CI 3.2-20.7)%, 8.3(4.7-14.6)% and 5.8(2.6-12.4)% and for urinary 8.4(3.2-20.8)%, 4.6(2.1-9.9)% and 3.9(1.5-9.9)% in no IGRT, IGRT-S and IGRT-R groups respectively. In an exploratory analysis, treatment efficacy appeared similar in all three groups. CONCLUSION:Introduction of IGRT was feasible in a national randomised trial and IGRT-R produced dosimetric benefits. Overall side effect profiles were acceptable in all groups but lowest with IGRT and reduced margins. ISRCTN:97182923.
Version of record
Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted
Aged, 80 and over
Patient Reported Outcome Measures
Radiation Dose Hypofractionation
Clinical Trials & Statistics Unit
ICR-CTSU Urology and Head and Neck Trials Team
Clinical Academic Radiotherapy (Dearnaley)
Radiotherapy Physics Modelling
License start date
Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology, 2020, 142 pp. 62 - 71
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
LAUNCH OF THE BREAST SCREENING AFTER RADIOTHERAPY DATASET - AN ENGLAND WIDE INITIATIVE TO IMPROVE SCREENING FOR BREAST CANCER IN 9,000 WOMEN AT HIGH RISK FOLLOWING RADIOTHERAPY TO BREAST TISSUE UNDER AGE 36 Radford, J; Howell, S; Vaughan, K; Goode, V; Worthington, D; Yates-Bolton, N; Payne, E; Jenkins, J; Sibbering, M; Swerdlow, A; Cowan, R (FERRATA STORTI FOUNDATION, 2016-10-01)
Radiotherapy Quality Assurance for the CHHiP Trial: Conventional Versus Hypofractionated High-Dose Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy in Prostate Cancer. Naismith, O; Mayles, H; Bidmead, M; Clark, CH; Gulliford, S; Hassan, S; Khoo, V; Roberts, K; South, C; Hall, E; Dearnaley, D; CHHiP Investigators (2019-09)AIMS:The CHHiP trial investigated the use of moderate hypofractionation for the treatment of localised prostate cancer using intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). A radiotherapy quality assurance programme was developed ...