Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSaba, NF
dc.contributor.authorBlumenschein, G
dc.contributor.authorGuigay, J
dc.contributor.authorLicitra, L
dc.contributor.authorFayette, J
dc.contributor.authorHarrington, KJ
dc.contributor.authorKiyota, N
dc.contributor.authorGillison, ML
dc.contributor.authorFerris, RL
dc.contributor.authorJayaprakash, V
dc.contributor.authorLi, L
dc.contributor.authorBrossart, P
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-03T10:09:36Z
dc.date.issued2019-09-01
dc.identifier.citationOral oncology, 2019, 96 pp. 7 - 14
dc.identifier.issn1368-8375
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.icr.ac.uk/handle/internal/3677
dc.identifier.eissn1879-0593
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.oraloncology.2019.06.017
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVES: Many patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) are ≥65 years old; comorbidities and other age-related factors may affect their ability to tolerate traditional chemotherapy. Nivolumab is the only immunotherapy to significantly improve overall survival (OS) versus investigator's choice (IC) of single-agent chemotherapy at primary analysis in a phase 3 trial (CheckMate 141) in patients with recurrent/metastatic SCCHN post-platinum therapy. In this post hoc analysis, we report efficacy and safety by age. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible patients were randomized 2:1 to nivolumab 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks (n = 240) or IC (methotrexate, docetaxel, or cetuximab n = 121). The primary endpoint of the trial was OS. For this analysis, outcomes were analyzed by age < 65 and ≥65 years. The data cut-off date was September 2017 (minimum follow-up 24.2 months). RESULTS: At baseline, 68 patients (28.3%) receiving nivolumab and 45 patients (37.2%) receiving IC were ≥65 years. Baseline characteristics were generally similar across age groups. OS and tumor response benefits with nivolumab versus IC were maintained regardless of age. The 30-month OS rates of 11.2% (<65 years) and 13.0% (≥65 years) with nivolumab were more than tripled versus corresponding IC rates of 1.4% and 3.3%, respectively. The nivolumab arm had a lower rate of treatment-related adverse events versus IC regardless of age, consistent with the overall patient population. CONCLUSION: In CheckMate 141, nivolumab resulted in a higher survival versus IC in patients <65 and ≥65 years, with a manageable safety profile in both age groups. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02105636.
dc.formatPrint-Electronic
dc.format.extent7 - 14
dc.languageeng
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherELSEVIER
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectNeoplasm Metastasis
dc.subjectAge Factors
dc.subjectAged
dc.subjectFemale
dc.subjectMale
dc.subjectAntineoplastic Agents, Immunological
dc.subjectSquamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck
dc.subjectNivolumab
dc.titleNivolumab versus investigator's choice in patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: Efficacy and safety in CheckMate 141 by age.
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.dateAccepted2019-06-13
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1016/j.oraloncology.2019.06.017
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2019-09
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review
dc.relation.isPartOfOral oncology
pubs.notesNot known
pubs.organisational-group/ICR
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Cancer Biology
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Cancer Biology/Targeted Therapy
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Radiotherapy and Imaging
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Radiotherapy and Imaging/Targeted Therapy
pubs.organisational-group/ICR
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Cancer Biology
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Cancer Biology/Targeted Therapy
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Radiotherapy and Imaging
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Radiotherapy and Imaging/Targeted Therapy
pubs.publication-statusPublished
pubs.volume96
pubs.embargo.termsNot known
icr.researchteamTargeted Therapy
dc.contributor.icrauthorHarrington, Kevin


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following collection(s)

Show simple item record

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0