Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAndtbacka, RHI
dc.contributor.authorCollichio, F
dc.contributor.authorHarrington, KJ
dc.contributor.authorMiddleton, MR
dc.contributor.authorDowney, G
dc.contributor.authorӦhrling, K
dc.contributor.authorKaufman, HL
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-03T14:19:02Z
dc.date.issued2019-06-06
dc.identifier.citationJournal for immunotherapy of cancer, 2019, 7 (1), pp. 145 - ?
dc.identifier.issn2051-1426
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.icr.ac.uk/handle/internal/3694
dc.identifier.eissn2051-1426
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s40425-019-0623-z
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Talimogene laherparepvec is an oncolytic immunotherapy approved in the US, Europe, Australia and Switzerland. We report the final planned analysis of OPTiM, a randomized open-label phase III trial in patients with unresectable stage IIIB-IVM1c melanoma. METHODS: Patients were randomized 2:1 to receive intratumoral talimogene laherparepvec or subcutaneous recombinant GM-CSF. In addition to overall survival (OS), durable response rate (DRR), objective response rate (ORR), complete responses (CR), and safety are also reported. All final analyses are considered to be descriptive and treatment responses were assessed by the investigators. RESULTS: Of 436 patients in the intent-to-treat population, 295 were allocated to talimogene laherparepvec and 141 to GM-CSF. Median follow-up in the final OS analysis was 49 months. Median OS was 23.3 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 19.5-29.6) and 18.9 months (95% CI, 16.0-23.7) in the talimogene laherparepvec and GM-CSF arms, respectively (unstratified hazard ratio, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.62-1.00; p = 0.0494 [descriptive]). DRR was 19.0 and 1.4% (unadjusted odds ratio, 16.6; 95% CI, 4.0-69.2; p < 0.0001); ORR was 31.5 and 6.4%. Fifty (16.9%) and 1 (0.7%) patient in the talimogene laherparepvec and GM-CSF arms, respectively, achieved CR. In talimogene laherparepvec-treated patients, median time to CR was 8.6 months; median CR duration was not reached. Among patients with a CR, 88.5% were estimated to survive at a 5-year landmark analysis. Talimogene laherparepvec efficacy was more pronounced in stage IIIB-IVM1a melanoma as already described in the primary analysis. The safety reporting was consistent with the primary OPTiM analysis. CONCLUSIONS: In this final planned OPTiM analysis, talimogene laherparepvec continued to result in improved longer-term efficacy versus GM-CSF and remained well tolerated. The final analysis also confirms that talimogene laherparepvec was associated with durable CRs that were associated with prolonged survival. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00769704 .
dc.formatElectronic
dc.format.extent145 - ?
dc.languageeng
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherBMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectHerpesvirus 1, Human
dc.subjectMelanoma
dc.subjectGranulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor
dc.subjectBiological Products
dc.subjectNeoplasm Staging
dc.subjectTreatment Outcome
dc.subjectImmunotherapy
dc.subjectAged
dc.subjectMiddle Aged
dc.subjectFemale
dc.subjectMale
dc.subjectAntineoplastic Agents, Immunological
dc.titleFinal analyses of OPTiM: a randomized phase III trial of talimogene laherparepvec versus granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor in unresectable stage III-IV melanoma.
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.dateAccepted2019-05-17
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1186/s40425-019-0623-z
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2019-06-06
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review
dc.relation.isPartOfJournal for immunotherapy of cancer
pubs.issue1
pubs.notesNot known
pubs.organisational-group/ICR
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Cancer Biology
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Cancer Biology/Targeted Therapy
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Radiotherapy and Imaging
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Radiotherapy and Imaging/Targeted Therapy
pubs.organisational-group/ICR
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Cancer Biology
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Cancer Biology/Targeted Therapy
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Radiotherapy and Imaging
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Radiotherapy and Imaging/Targeted Therapy
pubs.publication-statusPublished
pubs.volume7
pubs.embargo.termsNot known
icr.researchteamTargeted Therapy
dc.contributor.icrauthorHarrington, Kevin


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following collection(s)

Show simple item record

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0