Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorZugni, Fen_US
dc.contributor.authorPadhani, ARen_US
dc.contributor.authorKoh, D-Men_US
dc.contributor.authorSummers, PEen_US
dc.contributor.authorBellomi, Men_US
dc.contributor.authorPetralia, Gen_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-22T09:34:58Z
dc.date.issued2020-05-11
dc.identifier.citationCancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society, 2020, 20 (1), pp. 34 - ?
dc.identifier.issn1740-5025
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.icr.ac.uk/handle/internal/3755
dc.identifier.eissn1470-7330
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s40644-020-00315-0
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND:The number of studies describing the use of whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (WB-MRI) for screening of malignant tumours in asymptomatic subjects is increasing. Our aim is to review the methodologies used and the results of the published studies on per patient and per lesion analysis, and to provide recommendations on the use of WB-MRI for cancer screening. MAIN BODY:We identified 12 studies, encompassing 6214 WB-MRI examinations, which provided the rates of abnormal findings and findings suspicious for cancer in asymptomatic subjects, from the general population. Eleven of 12 studies provided imaging protocols that included T1- and T2-weighted sequences, while only five included diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) of the whole body. Different categorical systems were used for the classification and the management of abnormal findings. Of 17,961 abnormal findings reported, 91% were benign, while 9% were oncologically relevant, requiring further investigations, and 0.5% of lesions were suspicious for cancer. A per-subject analysis showed that just 5% of subjects had no abnormal findings, while 95% had abnormal findings. Findings requiring further investigation were reported in 30% of all subjects, though in only 1.8% cancer was suspected. The overall rate of histologically confirmed cancer was 1.1%. CONCLUSION:WB-MRI studies of cancer screening in the asymptomatic general population are too heterogeneous to draw impactful conclusions regarding efficacy. A 5-point lesion scale based on the oncological relevance of findings appears the most appropriate for risk-based management stratification. WB-MRI examinations should be reported by experienced oncological radiologists versed on WB-MRI reading abnormalities and on onward referral pathways.
dc.formatElectronic
dc.format.extent34 - ?
dc.languageeng
dc.language.isoeng
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectNeoplasms
dc.subjectMagnetic Resonance Imaging
dc.subjectWhole Body Imaging
dc.subjectPractice Guidelines as Topic
dc.subjectEarly Detection of Cancer
dc.titleWhole-body magnetic resonance imaging (WB-MRI) for cancer screening in asymptomatic subjects of the general population: review and recommendations.
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.dateAccepted2020-05-03
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1186/s40644-020-00315-0
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2020-05-11
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review
dc.relation.isPartOfCancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society
pubs.issue1
pubs.notesNo embargo
pubs.organisational-group/ICR
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/Royal Marsden Clinical Units
pubs.publication-statusPublished
pubs.volume20
pubs.embargo.termsNo embargo
dc.contributor.icrauthorKoh, Dow-Mu


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following collection(s)

Show simple item record

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0