Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPesapane, Fen_US
dc.contributor.authorDowney, Ken_US
dc.contributor.authorRotili, Aen_US
dc.contributor.authorCassano, Een_US
dc.contributor.authorKoh, D-Men_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-07-17T10:02:29Z
dc.date.issued2020-06-16
dc.identifier.citationInsights into imaging, 2020, 11 (1), pp. 79 - ?
dc.identifier.issn1869-4101
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.icr.ac.uk/handle/internal/3849
dc.identifier.eissn1869-4101
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s13244-020-00885-4
dc.description.abstractNumerous imaging modalities may be used for the staging of women with advanced breast cancer. Although bone scintigraphy and multiplanar-CT are the most frequently used tests, others including PET, MRI and hybrid scans are also utilised, with no specific recommendations of which test should be preferentially used. We review the evidence behind the imaging modalities that characterise metastases in breast cancer and to update the evidence on comparative imaging accuracy.
dc.formatElectronic
dc.format.extent79 - ?
dc.languageeng
dc.language.isoeng
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
dc.titleImaging diagnosis of metastatic breast cancer.
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.dateAccepted2020-05-22
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1186/s13244-020-00885-4
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2020-06-16
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review
dc.relation.isPartOfInsights into imaging
pubs.issue1
pubs.notesNot known
pubs.organisational-group/ICR
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/Royal Marsden Clinical Units
pubs.publication-statusPublished
pubs.volume11en_US
pubs.embargo.termsNot known
dc.contributor.icrauthorKoh, Dow-Mu


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following collection(s)

Show simple item record

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0