Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMcLaughlin, M
dc.contributor.authorBarker, HE
dc.contributor.authorKhan, AA
dc.contributor.authorPedersen, M
dc.contributor.authorDillon, M
dc.contributor.authorMansfield, DC
dc.contributor.authorPatel, R
dc.contributor.authorKyula, JN
dc.contributor.authorBhide, SA
dc.contributor.authorNewbold, KL
dc.contributor.authorNutting, CM
dc.contributor.authorHarrington, KJ
dc.date.accessioned2017-02-28T11:58:20Z
dc.date.issued2017-01-31
dc.identifier.citationBMC cancer, 2017, 17 (1), pp. 86 - ?
dc.identifier.issn1471-2407
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.icr.ac.uk/handle/internal/409
dc.identifier.eissn1471-2407
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12885-017-3084-0
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Concurrent cisplatin radiotherapy (CCRT) is a current standard-of-care for locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). However, CCRT is frequently ineffective in patients with advanced disease. It has previously been shown that HSP90 inhibitors act as radiosensitizers, but these studies have not focused on CCRT in HNSCC. Here, we evaluated the HSP90 inhibitor, AUY922, combined with CCRT. METHODS: The ability of AUY922 to sensitize to CCRT was assessed in p53 mutant head and neck cell lines by clonogenic assay. Modulation of the CCRT induced DNA damage response (DDR) by AUY922 was characterized by confocal image analysis of RAD51, BRCA1, 53BP1, ATM and mutant p53 signaling. The role of FANCA depletion by AUY922 was examined using shRNA. Cell cycle checkpoint abrogation and chromosomal fragmentation was assessed by western blot, FACS and confocal. The role of ATM was also assessed by shRNA. AUY922 in combination with CCRT was assessed in vivo. RESULTS: The combination of AUY922 with cisplatin, radiation and CCRT was found to be synergistic in p53 mutant HNSCC. AUY922 leads to significant alterations to the DDR induced by CCRT. This comprises inhibition of homologous recombination through decreased RAD51 and pS1524 BRCA1 with a corresponding increase in 53BP1 foci, activation of ATM and signaling into mutant p53. A shift to more error prone repair combined with a loss of checkpoint function leads to fragmentation of chromosomal material. The degree of disruption to DDR signalling correlated to chromosomal fragmentation and loss of clonogenicity. ATM shRNA indicated a possible rationale for the combination of AUY922 and CCRT in cells lacking ATM function. CONCLUSIONS: This study supports future clinical studies combining AUY922 and CCRT in p53 mutant HNSCC. Modulation of the DDR and chromosomal fragmentation are likely to be analytical points of interest in such trials.
dc.formatElectronic
dc.format.extent86 - ?
dc.languageeng
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherBIOMED CENTRAL LTD
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
dc.subjectCell Line, Tumor
dc.subjectChromosomes
dc.subjectAnimals
dc.subjectMice, Inbred BALB C
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectMice, Nude
dc.subjectCarcinoma, Squamous Cell
dc.subjectHead and Neck Neoplasms
dc.subjectDNA Damage
dc.subjectOrganoplatinum Compounds
dc.subjectResorcinols
dc.subjectIsoxazoles
dc.subjectBRCA1 Protein
dc.subjectProtein Kinase Inhibitors
dc.subjectDNA Fragmentation
dc.subjectDNA Repair
dc.subjectFemale
dc.subjectTumor Suppressor Protein p53
dc.subjectHSP90 Heat-Shock Proteins
dc.subjectChemoradiotherapy
dc.subjectHomologous Recombination
dc.subjectSquamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck
dc.titleHSP90 inhibition sensitizes head and neck cancer to platin-based chemoradiotherapy by modulation of the DNA damage response resulting in chromosomal fragmentation.
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.dateAccepted2017-01-23
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1186/s12885-017-3084-0
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2017-01-31
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review
dc.relation.isPartOfBMC cancer
pubs.issue1
pubs.notesNo embargo
pubs.organisational-group/ICR
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Cancer Biology
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Cancer Biology/Targeted Therapy
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Radiotherapy and Imaging
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Radiotherapy and Imaging/Targeted Therapy
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/Royal Marsden Clinical Units
pubs.organisational-group/ICR
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Cancer Biology
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Cancer Biology/Targeted Therapy
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Radiotherapy and Imaging
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Radiotherapy and Imaging/Targeted Therapy
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/Royal Marsden Clinical Units
pubs.publication-statusPublished
pubs.volume17
pubs.embargo.termsNo embargo
icr.researchteamTargeted Therapy
dc.contributor.icrauthorMcLaughlin, Martin
dc.contributor.icrauthorDillon, Magnus
dc.contributor.icrauthorMansfield, David
dc.contributor.icrauthorBhide, Shreerang
dc.contributor.icrauthorHarrington, Kevin


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following collection(s)

Show simple item record

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0