Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBandyopadhyay, S
dc.contributor.authorBhaduri, S
dc.contributor.authorÖrd, M
dc.contributor.authorDavey, NE
dc.contributor.authorLoog, M
dc.contributor.authorPryciak, PM
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-14T15:15:14Z
dc.date.issued2020-11
dc.identifier.citationCurrent biology : CB, 2020, 30 (22), pp. 4454 - 4466.e5
dc.identifier.issn0960-9822
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.icr.ac.uk/handle/internal/4149
dc.identifier.eissn1879-0445
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.cub.2020.08.099
dc.description.abstractMany protein-modifying enzymes recognize their substrates via docking motifs, but the range of functionally permissible motif sequences is often poorly defined. During eukaryotic cell division, cyclin-specific docking motifs help cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs) phosphorylate different substrates at different stages, thus enforcing a temporally ordered series of events. In budding yeast, CDK substrates with Leu/Pro-rich (LP) docking motifs are recognized by Cln1/2 cyclins in late G1 phase, yet the key sequence features of these motifs were unknown. Here, we comprehensively analyze LP motif requirements in vivo by combining a competitive growth assay with deep mutational scanning. We quantified the effect of all single-residue replacements in five different LP motifs by using six distinct G1 cyclins from diverse fungi including medical and agricultural pathogens. The results uncover substantial tolerance for deviations from the consensus sequence, plus requirements at some positions that are contingent on the favorability of other motif residues. They also reveal the basis for variations in functional potency among wild-type motifs, and allow derivation of a quantitative matrix that predicts the strength of other candidate motif sequences. Finally, we find that variation in docking motif potency can advance or delay the time at which CDK substrate phosphorylation occurs, and thereby control the temporal ordering of cell cycle regulation. The overall results provide a general method for surveying viable docking motif sequences and quantifying their potency in vivo, and they reveal how variations in docking strength can tune the degree and timing of regulatory modifications.
dc.formatPrint-Electronic
dc.format.extent4454 - 4466.e5
dc.languageeng
dc.language.isoeng
dc.rights.urihttps://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserved
dc.titleComprehensive Analysis of G1 Cyclin Docking Motif Sequences that Control CDK Regulatory Potency In Vivo.
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.dateAccepted2020-08-27
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1016/j.cub.2020.08.099
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttps://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserved
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2020-11
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review
dc.relation.isPartOfCurrent biology : CB
pubs.issue22
pubs.notesNo embargo
pubs.organisational-group/ICR
pubs.organisational-group/ICR
pubs.publication-statusPublished
pubs.volume30
pubs.embargo.termsNo embargo
dc.contributor.icrauthorDavey, Normanen


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following collection(s)

Show simple item record