Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDarst, BF
dc.contributor.authorDadaev, T
dc.contributor.authorSaunders, E
dc.contributor.authorSheng, X
dc.contributor.authorWan, P
dc.contributor.authorPooler, L
dc.contributor.authorXia, LY
dc.contributor.authorChanock, S
dc.contributor.authorBerndt, SI
dc.contributor.authorGapstur, SM
dc.contributor.authorStevens, V
dc.contributor.authorAlbanes, D
dc.contributor.authorWeinstein, SJ
dc.contributor.authorGnanapragasam, V
dc.contributor.authorGiles, GG
dc.contributor.authorNguyen-Dumont, T
dc.contributor.authorMilne, RL
dc.contributor.authorPomerantz, M
dc.contributor.authorSchmidt, JA
dc.contributor.authorMucci, L
dc.contributor.authorCatalona, WJ
dc.contributor.authorHetrick, KN
dc.contributor.authorDoheny, KF
dc.contributor.authorMacInnis, RJ
dc.contributor.authorSouthey, MC
dc.contributor.authorEeles, RA
dc.contributor.authorWiklund, F
dc.contributor.authorKote-Jarai, Z
dc.contributor.authorConti, DV
dc.contributor.authorHaiman, CA
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-22T11:48:34Z
dc.date.issued2021-05-04
dc.identifier.citationJournal of the National Cancer Institute, 2020
dc.identifier.issn0027-8874
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.icr.ac.uk/handle/internal/4190
dc.identifier.eissn1460-2105
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/jnci/djaa132
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: There is an urgent need to identify factors specifically associated with aggressive prostate cancer (PCa) risk. We investigated whether rare pathogenic, likely pathogenic, or deleterious (P/LP/D) germline variants in DNA repair genes are associated with aggressive PCa risk in a case-case study of aggressive vs nonaggressive disease. METHODS: Participants were 5545 European-ancestry men, including 2775 nonaggressive and 2770 aggressive PCa cases, which included 467 metastatic cases (16.9%). Samples were assembled from 12 international studies and germline sequenced together. Rare (minor allele frequency < 0.01) P/LP/D variants were analyzed for 155 DNA repair genes. We compared single variant, gene-based, and DNA repair pathway-based burdens by disease aggressiveness. All statistical tests are 2-sided. RESULTS: BRCA2 and PALB2 had the most statistically significant gene-based associations, with 2.5% of aggressive and 0.8% of nonaggressive cases carrying P/LP/D BRCA2 alleles (odds ratio [OR] = 3.19, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.94 to 5.25, P = 8.58 × 10-7) and 0.65% of aggressive and 0.11% of nonaggressive cases carrying P/LP/D PALB2 alleles (OR = 6.31, 95% CI = 1.83 to 21.68, P = 4.79 × 10-4). ATM had a nominal association, with 1.6% of aggressive and 0.8% of nonaggressive cases carrying P/LP/D ATM alleles (OR = 1.88, 95% CI = 1.10 to 3.22, P = .02). In aggregate, P/LP/D alleles within 24 literature-curated candidate PCa DNA repair genes were more common in aggressive than nonaggressive cases (carrier frequencies = 14.2% vs 10.6%, respectively; P = 5.56 × 10-5). However, this difference was non-statistically significant (P = .18) on excluding BRCA2, PALB2, and ATM. Among these 24 genes, P/LP/D carriers had a 1.06-year younger diagnosis age (95% CI = -1.65 to 0.48, P = 3.71 × 10-4). CONCLUSIONS: Risk conveyed by DNA repair genes is largely driven by rare P/LP/D alleles within BRCA2, PALB2, and ATM. These findings support the importance of these genes in both screening and disease management considerations.
dc.formatPrint-Electronic
dc.languageeng
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherOXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
dc.rights.urihttps://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserved
dc.titleGermline Sequencing DNA Repair Genes in 5545 Men With Aggressive and Nonaggressive Prostate Cancer.
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.dateAccepted2020-08-20
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1093/jnci/djaa132
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttps://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserved
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2020-08-27
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review
dc.relation.isPartOfJournal of the National Cancer Institute
pubs.notesNot known
pubs.organisational-group/ICR
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Genetics and Epidemiology
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Genetics and Epidemiology/Oncogenetics
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Radiotherapy and Imaging
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Radiotherapy and Imaging/Oncogenetics
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Students
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Students/PhD and MPhil
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Students/PhD and MPhil/18/19 Starting Cohort
pubs.organisational-group/ICR
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Genetics and Epidemiology
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Genetics and Epidemiology/Oncogenetics
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Radiotherapy and Imaging
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Radiotherapy and Imaging/Oncogenetics
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Students
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Students/PhD and MPhil
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Students/PhD and MPhil/18/19 Starting Cohort
pubs.publication-statusPublished
pubs.embargo.termsNot known
icr.researchteamOncogenetics
dc.contributor.icrauthorSaunders, Edward
dc.contributor.icrauthorEeles, Rosalind
dc.contributor.icrauthorKote-Jarai, Zsofia


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following collection(s)

Show simple item record