Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSmalley, KR
dc.contributor.authorAufegger, L
dc.contributor.authorFlott, K
dc.contributor.authorMayer, EK
dc.contributor.authorDarzi, A
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-30T13:48:38Z
dc.date.available2021-03-30T13:48:38Z
dc.identifier.citationPatient education and counseling, 2021, 104 (1), pp. 50 - 63
dc.identifier.issn0738-3991
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.icr.ac.uk/handle/internal/4464
dc.identifier.eissn1873-5134
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.pec.2020.08.015
dc.description.abstractObjective The study aims to evaluate the ability of self-management programmes to change the healthcare-seeking behaviours of people with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), and any associations between programme design and outcomes.Methods A systematic search of the literature returned randomised controlled trials of SMPs for COPD. Change in healthcare utilisation was the primary outcome measure. Programme design was analysed using the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF).Results A total of 26 papers described 19 SMPs. The most common utilisation outcome was hospitalisation (n = 22). Of these, 5 showed a significant decrease. Two theoretical domains were evidenced in all programmes: skills and behavioural regulation. All programmes evidenced at least 5 domains. However, there was no clear association between TDF domains and utilisation. Overall, study quality was moderate to poor.Conclusion This review highlights the need for more alignment in the goals, design, and evaluation of SMPs. Specifically, the TDF could be used to guide programme design and evaluation in future.Practice implications Practices have a reasonable expectation that interventions they adopt will provide patient benefit and value for money. Better design and reporting of SMP trials would address their ability to do so.
dc.formatPrint-Electronic
dc.format.extent50 - 63
dc.languageeng
dc.language.isoeng
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
dc.titleCan self-management programmes change healthcare utilisation in COPD?: A systematic review and framework analysis.
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.dateAccepted2020-08-13
rioxxterms.versionVoR
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1016/j.pec.2020.08.015
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review
dc.relation.isPartOfPatient education and counseling
pubs.issue1
pubs.notesNot known
pubs.organisational-group/ICR
pubs.organisational-group/ICR
pubs.publication-statusPublished
pubs.volume104
pubs.embargo.termsNot known
dc.contributor.icrauthorDarzi, Araen


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following collection(s)

Show simple item record

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0