Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorVale, CL
dc.contributor.authorFisher, D
dc.contributor.authorKneebone, A
dc.contributor.authorParker, C
dc.contributor.authorPearse, M
dc.contributor.authorRichaud, P
dc.contributor.authorSargos, P
dc.contributor.authorSydes, MR
dc.contributor.authorBrawley, C
dc.contributor.authorBrihoum, M
dc.contributor.authorBrown, C
dc.contributor.authorChabaud, S
dc.contributor.authorCook, A
dc.contributor.authorForcat, S
dc.contributor.authorFraser-Browne, C
dc.contributor.authorLatorzeff, I
dc.contributor.authorParmar, MKB
dc.contributor.authorTierney, JF
dc.contributor.authorARTISTIC Meta-analysis Group
dc.date.accessioned2021-05-06T15:45:00Z
dc.date.available2021-05-06T15:45:00Z
dc.date.issued2020-09-28
dc.identifier.citationLancet (London, England), 2020
dc.identifier.issn0140-6736
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.icr.ac.uk/handle/internal/4542
dc.identifier.eissn1474-547X
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/s0140-6736(20)31952-8
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND:It is unclear whether adjuvant or early salvage radiotherapy following radical prostatectomy is more appropriate for men who present with localised or locally advanced prostate cancer. We aimed to prospectively plan a systematic review of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing these radiotherapy approaches. METHODS:We used a prospective framework for adaptive meta-analysis (FAME), starting the review process while eligible trials were ongoing. RCTs were eligible if they aimed to compare immediate adjuvant radiotherapy versus early salvage radiotherapy, following radical prostatectomy in men (age ≥18 years) with intermediate-risk or high-risk, localised or locally advanced prostate cancer. We searched trial registers and conference proceedings until July 8, 2020, to identify eligible RCTs. By establishing the ARTISTIC collaboration with relevant trialists, we were able to anticipate when eligible trial results would emerge, and we developed and registered a protocol with PROSPERO before knowledge of the trial results (CRD42019132669). We used a harmonised definition of event-free survival, as the time from randomisation until the first evidence of either biochemical progression (prostate-specific antigen [PSA] ≥0·4 ng/mL and rising after completion of any postoperative radiotherapy), clinical or radiological progression, initiation of a non-trial treatment, death from prostate cancer, or a PSA level of at least 2·0 ng/mL at any time after randomisation. We predicted when we would have sufficient power to assess whether adjuvant radiotherapy was superior to early salvage radiotherapy. Investigators supplied results for event-free survival, both overall and within predefined patient subgroups. Hazard ratios (HRs) for the effects of radiotherapy timing on event-free survival and subgroup interactions were combined using fixed-effect meta-analysis. FINDINGS:We identified three eligible trials and were able to obtain updated results for event-free survival for 2153 patients recruited between November, 2007, and December, 2016. Median follow-up ranged from 60 months to 78 months, with a maximum follow-up of 132 months. 1075 patients were randomly assigned to receive adjuvant radiotherapy and 1078 to a policy of early salvage radiotherapy, of whom 421 (39·1%) had commenced treatment at the time of analysis. Patient characteristics were balanced within trials and overall. Median age was similar between trials at 64 or 65 years (with IQRs ranging from 59 to 68 years) across the three trials and most patients (1671 [77·6%]) had a Gleason score of 7. All trials were assessed as having low risk of bias. Based on 270 events, the meta-analysis showed no evidence that event-free survival was improved with adjuvant radiotherapy compared with early salvage radiotherapy (HR 0·95, 95% CI 0·75-1·21; p=0·70), with only a 1 percentage point (95% CI -2 to 3) change in 5-year event-free survival (89% vs 88%). Results were consistent across trials (heterogeneity p=0·18; I2=42%). INTERPRETATION:This collaborative and prospectively designed systematic review and meta-analysis suggests that adjuvant radiotherapy does not improve event-free survival in men with localised or locally advanced prostate cancer. Until data on long-term outcomes are available, early salvage treatment would seem the preferable treatment policy as it offers the opportunity to spare many men radiotherapy and its associated side-effects. FUNDING:UK Medical Research Council.
dc.formatPrint-Electronic
dc.languageeng
dc.language.isoeng
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
dc.subjectARTISTIC Meta-analysis Group
dc.titleAdjuvant or early salvage radiotherapy for the treatment of localised and locally advanced prostate cancer: a prospectively planned systematic review and meta-analysis of aggregate data.
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.dateAccepted2020-07-27
rioxxterms.versionAM
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1016/s0140-6736(20)31952-8
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2020-09-28
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review
dc.relation.isPartOfLancet (London, England)
pubs.notesNot known
pubs.organisational-group/ICR
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/Royal Marsden Clinical Units
pubs.organisational-group/ICR
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/Royal Marsden Clinical Units
pubs.publication-statusPublished
pubs.embargo.termsNot known
dc.contributor.icrauthorParker, Chris


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following collection(s)

Show simple item record

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0