Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorJoshi, M
dc.contributor.authorArcher, S
dc.contributor.authorMorbi, A
dc.contributor.authorArora, S
dc.contributor.authorKwasnicki, R
dc.contributor.authorAshrafian, H
dc.contributor.authorKhan, S
dc.contributor.authorCooke, G
dc.contributor.authorDarzi, A
dc.date.accessioned2021-07-09T14:21:09Z
dc.date.available2021-07-09T14:21:09Z
dc.date.issued2021-04-22
dc.identifier.citationJMIR perioperative medicine, 2021, 4 (1), pp. e18836 - ?
dc.identifier.issn2561-9128
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.icr.ac.uk/handle/internal/4678
dc.identifier.eissn2561-9128
dc.identifier.doi10.2196/18836
dc.description.abstractBackground Continuous vital sign monitoring using wearable sensors may enable early detection of patient deterioration and sepsis.Objective This study aimed to explore patient experiences with wearable sensor technology and carry out continuous monitoring through questionnaire and interview studies in an acute hospital setting.Methods Patients were recruited for a wearable sensor study and were asked to complete a 9-item questionnaire. Patients responses were evaluated using a Likert scale and with continuous variables. A subgroup of surgical patients wearing a Sensium Vital Sign Sensor was invited to participate in semistructured interviews. The Sensium wearable sensor measures the vital signs: heart rate, respiratory rate, and temperature. All interview data were subjected to thematic analysis.Results Out of a total of 500 patients, 453 (90.6%) completed the questionnaire. Furthermore, 427 (85.4%) patients agreed that the wearable sensor was comfortable, 429 (85.8%) patients agreed to wear the patch again when in hospital, and 398 (79.6%) patients agreed to wear the patch at home. Overall, 12 surgical patients consented to the interviews. Five main themes of interest to patients emerged from the interviews: (1) centralized monitoring, (2) enhanced feelings of patient safety, (3) impact on nursing staff, (4) comfort and usability, and (5) future use and views on technology.Conclusions Overall, the feedback from patients using wearable monitoring sensors was strongly positive with relatively few concerns raised. Patients felt that the wearable sensors would improve their sense of safety, relieve pressure on health care staff, and serve as a favorable aspect of future health care technology.
dc.formatElectronic
dc.format.extente18836 - ?
dc.languageeng
dc.language.isoeng
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
dc.titleShort-Term Wearable Sensors for In-Hospital Medical and Surgical Patients: Mixed Methods Analysis of Patient Perspectives.
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.dateAccepted2021-01-13
rioxxterms.versionVoR
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.2196/18836
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2021-04-22
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review
dc.relation.isPartOfJMIR perioperative medicine
pubs.issue1
pubs.notesNot known
pubs.organisational-group/ICR
pubs.organisational-group/ICR
pubs.publication-statusPublished
pubs.volume4
pubs.embargo.termsNot known
dc.contributor.icrauthorDarzi, Ara


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following collection(s)

Show simple item record

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0