Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGuerreiro, F
dc.contributor.authorBurgos, N
dc.contributor.authorDunlop, A
dc.contributor.authorWong, K
dc.contributor.authorPetkar, I
dc.contributor.authorNutting, C
dc.contributor.authorHarrington, K
dc.contributor.authorBhide, S
dc.contributor.authorNewbold, K
dc.contributor.authorDearnaley, D
dc.contributor.authordeSouza, NM
dc.contributor.authorMorgan, VA
dc.contributor.authorMcClelland, J
dc.contributor.authorNill, S
dc.contributor.authorCardoso, MJ
dc.contributor.authorOurselin, S
dc.contributor.authorOelfke, U
dc.contributor.authorKnopf, AC
dc.date.accessioned2017-03-24T14:04:06Z
dc.date.issued2017-03-01
dc.identifier.citationPhysica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics (AIFB), 2017, 35 pp. 7 - 17
dc.identifier.issn1120-1797
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.icr.ac.uk/handle/internal/493
dc.identifier.eissn1724-191X
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ejmp.2017.02.017
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Computed tomography (CT) imaging is the current gold standard for radiotherapy treatment planning (RTP). The establishment of a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) only RTP workflow requires the generation of a synthetic CT (sCT) for dose calculation. This study evaluates the feasibility of using a multi-atlas sCT synthesis approach (sCTa) for head and neck and prostate patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The multi-atlas method was based on pairs of non-rigidly aligned MR and CT images. The sCTa was obtained by registering the MRI atlases to the patient's MRI and by fusing the mapped atlases according to morphological similarity to the patient. For comparison, a bulk density assignment approach (sCTbda) was also evaluated. The sCTbda was obtained by assigning density values to MRI tissue classes (air, bone and soft-tissue). After evaluating the synthesis accuracy of the sCTs (mean absolute error), sCT-based delineations were geometrically compared to the CT-based delineations. Clinical plans were re-calculated on both sCTs and a dose-volume histogram and a gamma analysis was performed using the CT dose as ground truth. RESULTS: Results showed that both sCTs were suitable to perform clinical dose calculations with mean dose differences less than 1% for both the planning target volume and the organs at risk. However, only the sCTa provided an accurate and automatic delineation of bone. CONCLUSIONS: Combining MR delineations with our multi-atlas CT synthesis method could enable MRI-only treatment planning and thus improve the dosimetric and geometric accuracy of the treatment, and reduce the number of imaging procedures.
dc.formatPrint-Electronic
dc.format.extent7 - 17
dc.languageeng
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherELSEVIER SCI LTD
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectOropharyngeal Neoplasms
dc.subjectProstatic Neoplasms
dc.subjectTomography, X-Ray Computed
dc.subjectMagnetic Resonance Imaging
dc.subjectRadiotherapy Dosage
dc.subjectRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted
dc.subjectRetrospective Studies
dc.subjectFeasibility Studies
dc.subjectAlgorithms
dc.subjectMale
dc.subjectRadiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated
dc.subjectAtlases as Topic
dc.titleEvaluation of a multi-atlas CT synthesis approach for MRI-only radiotherapy treatment planning.
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.dateAccepted2017-02-14
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1016/j.ejmp.2017.02.017
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2017-03
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review
dc.relation.isPartOfPhysica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics (AIFB)
pubs.notesNo embargo
pubs.organisational-group/ICR
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Cancer Biology
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Cancer Biology/Targeted Therapy
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Closed research teams
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Closed research teams/Clinical Academic Radiotherapy (Dearnaley)
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Radiotherapy and Imaging
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Radiotherapy and Imaging/Magnetic Resonance
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Radiotherapy and Imaging/Radiotherapy Physics Modelling
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Radiotherapy and Imaging/Targeted Therapy
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/Royal Marsden Clinical Units
pubs.publication-statusPublished
pubs.volume35
pubs.embargo.termsNo embargo
icr.researchteamClinical Academic Radiotherapy (Dearnaley)
icr.researchteamMagnetic Resonance
icr.researchteamRadiotherapy Physics Modelling
icr.researchteamTargeted Therapy
dc.contributor.icrauthorHarrington, Kevin
dc.contributor.icrauthorBhide, Shreerang
dc.contributor.icrauthorDearnaley, David
dc.contributor.icrauthordeSouza, Nandita
dc.contributor.icrauthorNill, Simeon


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following collection(s)

Show simple item record

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0