Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorArend, RC
dc.contributor.authorO'Malley, DM
dc.contributor.authorBanerjee, S
dc.contributor.authorMcLaurin, K
dc.contributor.authorDavidson, R
dc.contributor.authorLong, GH
dc.date.accessioned2022-01-26T16:06:32Z
dc.date.available2022-01-26T16:06:32Z
dc.date.issued2021-11-02
dc.identifier.citationAdvances in therapy, 2021
dc.identifier.issn0741-238X
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.icr.ac.uk/handle/internal/4982
dc.identifier.eissn1865-8652
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s12325-021-01959-5
dc.description.abstract<h4>Introduction</h4>We aimed to characterize real-world utilization of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors (PARPi) in women with ovarian cancer (OC).<h4>Methods</h4>This retrospective observational study of claims data from US MarketScan<sup>®</sup> Commercial/Medicare Supplemental databases included women with OC initiating olaparib, niraparib, or rucaparib from January 1, 2017, to May 31, 2019. Patients were observed from first outpatient prescription until at least 30 days' follow-up. Clinical events of interest (CEIs), based on adverse reactions in PARPi prescribing information, were identified from claims using ICD-9/10 codes. Other outcomes included dose modification, persistence, adherence, healthcare resource utilization (HCRU), and cost.<h4>Results</h4>Overall, 303, 348, and 162 women with OC received olaparib, niraparib, and rucaparib, respectively. During follow-up, risk of any CEI was higher with niraparib versus olaparib (odds ratio 3.36 [95% confidence interval 2.00-5.65]) and niraparib versus rucaparib (2.09 [1.10-3.95]), with no significant difference between rucaparib and olaparib (1.61 [0.93-2.79]). PARPi dose decreases were observed in 21.1%, 35.1%, and 30.2% of olaparib-, niraparib-, and rucaparib-treated patients, respectively. Persistence (no treatment gaps of more than 90 days) was significantly higher (P < 0.05) with olaparib (62.2%) versus niraparib (35.9%) and rucaparib (48.7%); adherence (medication possession ratio, MPR ≥ 80%) was 80.2% versus 38.6% and 63.2%, respectively (P < 0.001). Inpatient admissions and outpatient service use were higher with niraparib and rucaparib versus olaparib, reflected in mean (± standard deviation) total medical costs (excluding pharmacy) of $5393 ± 8828 for olaparib, $7732 ± 14,054 for niraparib, and $6868 ± 7929 for rucaparib.<h4>Conclusion</h4>Differences between the licensed PARPi were observed in the risk of experiencing a CEI, likelihood of dose modifications, ability to receive continuous PARPi therapy, HCRU, and costs.
dc.formatPrint-Electronic
dc.languageeng
dc.language.isoeng
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.titleUtilization of Poly(ADP-Ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors in Ovarian Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort Study of US Healthcare Claims Data.
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.dateAccepted2021-10-08
rioxxterms.versionVoR
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1007/s12325-021-01959-5
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2021-11-02
dc.relation.isPartOfAdvances in therapy
pubs.notesNot known
pubs.organisational-group/ICR
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/Royal Marsden Clinical Units
pubs.publication-statusPublished
pubs.embargo.termsNot known
dc.contributor.icrauthorBanerjee, Susana


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following collection(s)

Show simple item record

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/