Phase III Soft Tissue Sarcoma Trials: Success or Failure?
MetadataShow full item record
OPINION STATEMENT: Two recently reported phase III randomised control trials (RCTs) have resulted in the registration of two new systemic therapies for advanced soft tissue sarcoma. Both of these trials' designs were informed by phase II data that guided the selection of sensitive STS diagnoses, enabling the demonstration of benefit in certain subtypes. A number of other phase III trials reported in the last 18 months have seemingly fit into a recurrent pattern of failure-promising efficacy signals in earlier phase studies being lost in the survival follow-up of large, highly heterogeneous cohorts. Greater effort is needed to identify histological and molecularly defined subgroups associated with differential treatment response in order to avoid the tremendous disappointment and loss of resources associated with a failed phase III trial. Additionally, improvements in available treatment of advanced STS have underpinned a prolongation in overall survival (OS). Consequently, surrogate efficacy endpoints are of increasing importance to STS drug trials. Whilst progression-free survival (PFS) should arguably replace overall survival as the primary endpoint of choice in first-line studies, more work is required to provide definitive validation of surrogacy, as well as developing more sophisticated techniques of assessing radiological response and expanding the inclusion of quality-of-life-related endpoints.
Version of record
Clinical trial design
Soft tissue sarcoma
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Standard of Care
Sarcoma Clinical Trials (R Jones)
License start date
Curr Treat Options Oncol, 2017, 18 (3), pp. 19 - ?
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
How informed is declared altruism in clinical trials? A qualitative interview study of patient decision-making about the QUEST trials (Quality of Life after Mastectomy and Breast Reconstruction). Bidad, N; MacDonald, L; Winters, ZE; Edwards, SJ; Emson, M; Griffin, CL; Bliss, J; Horne, R (2016-01)Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) often fail to recruit sufficient participants, despite altruism being cited as their motivation. Previous investigations of factors influencing participation decisions have been ...
Conveying Equipoise during Recruitment for Clinical Trials: Qualitative Synthesis of Clinicians’ Practices across Six Randomised Controlled Trials Rooshenas, L; Elliott, D; Wade, J; Jepson, M; Paramasivan, S; Strong, S; Wilson, C; Beard, D; Blazeby, JM; Birtle, A; Halliday, A; Rogers, CA; Stein, R; Donovan, JL (2016-10-18)
Ten-Year Progression-Free and Overall Survival in Patients With Unresectable or Metastatic GI Stromal Tumors: Long-Term Analysis of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Italian Sarcoma Group, and Australasian Gastrointestinal Trials Group Intergroup Phase III Randomized Trial on Imatinib at Two Dose Levels. Casali, PG; Zalcberg, J; Le Cesne, A; Reichardt, P; Blay, J-Y; Lindner, LH; Judson, IR; Schöffski, P; Leyvraz, S; Italiano, A; Grünwald, V; Pousa, AL; Kotasek, D; Sleijfer, S; Kerst, JM; Rutkowski, P; Fumagalli, E; Hogendoorn, P; Litière, S; Marreaud, S; van der Graaf, W; Gronchi, A; Verweij, J; European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Soft Tissue and Bone Sarcoma Group, Italian Sarcoma Group, and Australasian Gastrointestinal Trials Group (2017-05-20)Purpose To report on the long-term results of a randomized trial comparing a standard dose (400 mg/d) versus a higher dose (800 mg/d) of imatinib in patients with metastatic or locally advanced GI stromal tumors (GISTs). ...