Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorJohnston, EW
dc.contributor.authorBasso, J
dc.contributor.authorWinfield, J
dc.contributor.authorMcCall, J
dc.contributor.authorKhan, N
dc.contributor.authorMessiou, C
dc.contributor.authorKoh, D-M
dc.contributor.authorFotiadis, N
dc.coverage.spatialEngland
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-06T11:55:26Z
dc.date.available2022-09-06T11:55:26Z
dc.date.issued2022-06-01
dc.identifierARTN 20220217
dc.identifier.citationBritish Journal of Radiology, 2022, 95 (1134), pp. 20220217 -
dc.identifier.issn0007-1285
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.icr.ac.uk/handle/internal/5420
dc.identifier.eissn1748-880X
dc.identifier.eissn1748-880X
dc.identifier.doi10.1259/bjr.20220217
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVE: A commercially available CT-guided robot offers enhanced abilities in planning, targeting, and confirming accurate needle placement. In this short communication, we describe our first UK experience of robotic interventional oncology procedures. METHODS: We describe the device, discuss installation, operation, and report upon needle insertion success, accuracy (path deviation; PD and tip deviation; TD), number of adjustments, complications, and procedural success. RESULTS: Nine patients (seven males), median age 66 years (range 43-79) were consented for biopsy or ablation between March and April 2021. Needle placement in biopsy was more accurate than ablation (median 1 vs 11 mm PD and 1 vs 20 mm TD) and required fewer adjustments (median 0 vs 5). No complications arose, and all procedures were successful (diagnostic material obtained or complete ablation at follow-up). CONCLUSION: Short procedure times and very high levels of accuracy were readily achieved with biopsy procedures, although tumour ablation was less accurate which likely reflects higher procedural complexity. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: Achieving highly accurate robotic biopsy with is feasible within a very short time span. Further work is required to maximise the potential of robotic guidance in tumour ablation procedures, which is likely due to higher complexity giving a longer learning curve.
dc.formatPrint-Electronic
dc.format.extent20220217 -
dc.languageeng
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherBRITISH INST RADIOLOGY
dc.relation.ispartofBritish Journal of Radiology
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subjectAdult
dc.subjectAged
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectMale
dc.subjectMiddle Aged
dc.subjectNeedles
dc.subjectRobotic Surgical Procedures
dc.subjectRobotics
dc.subjectTomography, X-Ray Computed
dc.subjectUnited Kingdom
dc.titleStarting CT-guided robotic interventional oncology at a UK centre.
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.dateAccepted2022-03-07
dc.date.updated2022-09-06T11:54:38Z
rioxxterms.versionVoR
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1259/bjr.20220217
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2022-06-01
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review
pubs.author-urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35290098
pubs.issue1134
pubs.organisational-group/ICR
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/Royal Marsden Clinical Units
pubs.publication-statusPublished
pubs.publisher-urlhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20220217
pubs.volume95
icr.researchteamAppl Phys in Clinical MRI
icr.researchteamRMH Honorary Faculty
dc.contributor.icrauthorJohnston
icr.provenanceDeposited by Mr Arek Surman on 2022-09-06. Deposit type is initial. No. of files: 1. Files: bjr.20220217.pdf


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following collection(s)

Show simple item record

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/