Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBorek, AJ
dc.contributor.authorCampbell, A
dc.contributor.authorDent, E
dc.contributor.authorMoore, M
dc.contributor.authorButler, CC
dc.contributor.authorHolmes, A
dc.contributor.authorWalker, AS
dc.contributor.authorMcLeod, M
dc.contributor.authorTonkin-Crine, S
dc.contributor.authorSTEP-UP study team,
dc.coverage.spatialEngland
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-04T08:19:43Z
dc.date.available2022-10-04T08:19:43Z
dc.date.issued2021-09-15
dc.identifier104
dc.identifier10.1186/s43058-021-00209-7
dc.identifier.citationImplementation Science Communications, 2021, 2 (1), pp. 104 -
dc.identifier.issn2662-2211
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.icr.ac.uk/handle/internal/5514
dc.identifier.eissn2662-2211
dc.identifier.eissn2662-2211
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s43058-021-00209-7
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Trials show that antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) strategies, including communication skills training, point-of-care C-reactive protein testing (POC-CRPT) and delayed prescriptions, help optimise antibiotic prescribing and use in primary care. However, the use of these strategies in general practice is limited and inconsistent. We aimed to develop an intervention to enhance uptake and implementation of these strategies in primary care. METHODS: We drew on the Person-Based Approach to develop an implementation intervention in two stages. (1) Planning and design: We defined the problem in behavioural terms drawing on existing literature and conducting primary qualitative research (nine focus groups) in high-prescribing general practices. We identified 'guiding principles' with intervention objectives and key features and developed logic models representing intended mechanisms of action. (2) Developing the intervention: We created prototype intervention materials and discussed and refined these with input from 13 health professionals and 14 citizens in two sets of design workshops. We further refined the intervention materials following think-aloud interviews with 22 health professionals. RESULTS: Focus groups highlighted uncertainties about how strategies could be used. Health professionals in the workshops suggested having practice champions, brief summaries of each AMS strategy and evidence supporting the AMS strategies, and they and citizens gave examples of helpful communication strategies/phrases. Think-aloud interviews helped clarify and shorten the text and user journey of the intervention materials. The intervention comprised components to support practice-level implementation: antibiotic champions, practice meetings with slides provided, and an 'implementation support' website section, and components to support individual-level uptake: website sections on each AMS strategy (with evidence, instructions, links to electronic resources) and material resources (patient leaflets, POC-CRPT equipment, clinician handouts). CONCLUSIONS: We used a systematic, user-focussed process of developing a behavioural intervention, illustrating how it can be used in an implementation context. This resulted in a multicomponent intervention to facilitate practice-wide implementation of evidence-based strategies which now requires implementing and evaluating. Focusing on supporting the uptake and implementation of evidence-based strategies to optimise antibiotic use in general practice is critical to further support appropriate antibiotic use and mitigate antimicrobial resistance.
dc.formatElectronic
dc.format.extent104 -
dc.languageeng
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLC
dc.relation.ispartofImplementation Science Communications
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subjectAntibiotic prescribing
dc.subjectAntibiotic resistance
dc.subjectAntimicrobial stewardship
dc.subjectBehaviour change
dc.subjectCommunication
dc.subjectDelayed prescriptions
dc.subjectImplementation
dc.subjectIntervention development
dc.subjectPoint-of-care C-reactive protein test
dc.subjectQualitative
dc.titleDevelopment of an intervention to support the implementation of evidence-based strategies for optimising antibiotic prescribing in general practice.
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.dateAccepted2021-08-30
dc.date.updated2022-10-04T07:32:57Z
rioxxterms.versionVoR
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1186/s43058-021-00209-7
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2021-09-15
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review
pubs.author-urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34526140
pubs.issue1
pubs.organisational-group/ICR
pubs.publication-statusPublished online
pubs.publisher-urlhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s43058-021-00209-7
pubs.volume2
icr.provenanceDeposited by Prof Ceire Costelloe on 2022-10-04. Deposit type is initial. No. of files: 1. Files: Development of an intervention to support the implementation of evidence-based strategies for optimising antibiotic prescrib.pdf


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following collection(s)

Show simple item record

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/