Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorOʼFlynn, EAM
dc.contributor.authorFromageau, J
dc.contributor.authorLedger, AE
dc.contributor.authorMessa, A
dc.contributor.authorDʼAquino, A
dc.contributor.authorSchoemaker, MJ
dc.contributor.authorSchmidt, M
dc.contributor.authorDuric, N
dc.contributor.authorSwerdlow, AJ
dc.contributor.authorBamber, JC
dc.date.accessioned2017-04-03T10:18:13Z
dc.date.issued2017-06-01
dc.identifier.citationInvestigative radiology, 2017, 52 (6), pp. 343 - 348
dc.identifier.issn0020-9996
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.icr.ac.uk/handle/internal/552
dc.identifier.eissn1536-0210
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/rli.0000000000000347
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVES: Ultrasound tomography (UST) is an emerging whole-breast 3-dimensional imaging technique that obtains quantitative tomograms of speed of sound of the entire breast. The imaged parameter is the speed of sound which is used as a surrogate measure of density at each voxel and holds promise as a method to evaluate breast density without ionizing radiation. This study evaluated the technique of UST and compared whole-breast volume averaged speed of sound (VASS) with MR percent water content from noncontrast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-three healthy female volunteers (median age, 40 years; range, 29-59 years) underwent bilateral breast UST and MRI using a 2-point Dixon technique. Reproducibility of VASS was evaluated using Bland-Altman analysis. Volume averaged speed of sound and MR percent water were evaluated and compared using Pearson correlation coefficient. RESULTS: The mean ± standard deviation VASS measurement was 1463 ± 29 m s (range, 1434-1542 m s). There was high similarity between right (1464 ± 30 m s) and left (1462 ± 28 m s) breasts (P = 0.113) (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.98). Mean MR percent water content was 35.7% ± 14.7% (range, 13.2%-75.3%), with small but significant differences between right and left breasts (36.3% ± 14.9% and 35.1% ± 14.7%, respectively; P = 0.004). There was a very strong correlation between VASS and MR percent water density (r = 0.96, P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasound tomography holds promise as a reliable and reproducible 3-dimensional technique to provide a surrogate measure of breast density and correlates strongly with MR percent water content.
dc.formatPrint
dc.format.extent343 - 348
dc.languageeng
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherLIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
dc.subjectBreast
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectImaging, Three-Dimensional
dc.subjectMagnetic Resonance Imaging
dc.subjectMammography
dc.subjectTomography
dc.subjectUltrasonography, Mammary
dc.subjectProspective Studies
dc.subjectReproducibility of Results
dc.subjectAdult
dc.subjectMiddle Aged
dc.subjectFemale
dc.subjectBreast Density
dc.titleUltrasound Tomography Evaluation of Breast Density: A Comparison With Noncontrast Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.dateAccepted2016-11-22
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1097/rli.0000000000000347
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2017-06
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review
dc.relation.isPartOfInvestigative radiology
pubs.issue6
pubs.notesNot known
pubs.organisational-group/ICR
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Breast Cancer Research
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Breast Cancer Research/Aetiological Epidemiology
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Genetics and Epidemiology
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Genetics and Epidemiology/Aetiological Epidemiology
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Radiotherapy and Imaging
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Radiotherapy and Imaging/Radiotherapy Physics Modelling
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Radiotherapy and Imaging/Ultrasound & Optical Imaging
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/Royal Marsden Clinical Units
pubs.organisational-group/ICR
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Breast Cancer Research
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Breast Cancer Research/Aetiological Epidemiology
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Genetics and Epidemiology
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Genetics and Epidemiology/Aetiological Epidemiology
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Radiotherapy and Imaging
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Radiotherapy and Imaging/Radiotherapy Physics Modelling
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Radiotherapy and Imaging/Ultrasound & Optical Imaging
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/Royal Marsden Clinical Units
pubs.publication-statusPublished
pubs.volume52
pubs.embargo.termsNot known
icr.researchteamAetiological Epidemiology
icr.researchteamRadiotherapy Physics Modelling
icr.researchteamUltrasound & Optical Imaging
dc.contributor.icrauthorSchoemaker, Minouk
dc.contributor.icrauthorSwerdlow, Anthony
dc.contributor.icrauthorBamber, Jeffrey


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following collection(s)

Show simple item record

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0