Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorIlett, E
dc.contributor.authorKottke, T
dc.contributor.authorThompson, J
dc.contributor.authorRajani, K
dc.contributor.authorZaidi, S
dc.contributor.authorEvgin, L
dc.contributor.authorCoffey, M
dc.contributor.authorRalph, C
dc.contributor.authorDiaz, R
dc.contributor.authorPandha, H
dc.contributor.authorHarrington, K
dc.contributor.authorSelby, P
dc.contributor.authorBram, R
dc.contributor.authorMelcher, A
dc.contributor.authorVile, R
dc.date.accessioned2017-04-11T09:05:14Z
dc.date.issued2017-01-01
dc.identifier.citationGene therapy, 2017, 24 (1), pp. 21 - 30
dc.identifier.issn0969-7128
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.icr.ac.uk/handle/internal/576
dc.identifier.eissn1476-5462
dc.identifier.doi10.1038/gt.2016.70
dc.description.abstractThe anti-tumour effects associated with oncolytic virus therapy are mediated significantly through immune-mediated mechanisms, which depend both on the type of virus and the route of delivery. Here, we show that intra-tumoral oncolysis by Reovirus induced the priming of a CD8+, Th1-type anti-tumour response. By contrast, systemically delivered Vesicular Stomatitis Virus expressing a cDNA library of melanoma antigens (VSV-ASMEL) promoted a potent anti-tumour CD4+ Th17 response. Therefore, we hypothesised that combining the Reovirus-induced CD8+ T cell response, with the VSV-ASMEL CD4+ Th17 helper response, would produce enhanced anti-tumour activity. Consistent with this, priming with intra-tumoral Reovirus, followed by an intra-venous VSV-ASMEL Th17 boost, significantly improved survival of mice bearing established subcutaneous B16 melanoma tumours. We also show that combination of either therapy alone with anti-PD-1 immune checkpoint blockade augmented both the Th1 response induced by systemically delivered Reovirus in combination with GM-CSF, and also the Th17 response induced by VSV-ASMEL. Significantly, anti-PD-1 also uncovered an anti-tumour Th1 response following VSV-ASMEL treatment that was not seen in the absence of checkpoint blockade. Finally, the combination of all three treatments (priming with systemically delivered Reovirus, followed by double boosting with systemic VSV-ASMEL and anti-PD-1) significantly enhanced survival, with long-term cures, compared to any individual, or double, combination therapies, associated with strong Th1 and Th17 responses to tumour antigens. Our data show that it is possible to generate fully systemic, highly effective anti-tumour immunovirotherapy by combining oncolytic viruses, along with immune checkpoint blockade, to induce complementary mechanisms of anti-tumour immune responses.
dc.formatPrint-Electronic
dc.format.extent21 - 30
dc.languageeng
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherNATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
dc.rights.urihttps://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved
dc.subjectTh1 Cells
dc.subjectCD8-Positive T-Lymphocytes
dc.subjectCell Line, Tumor
dc.subjectAnimals
dc.subjectMice
dc.subjectVesiculovirus
dc.subjectReoviridae
dc.subjectMelanoma
dc.subjectGranulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor
dc.subjectImmunotherapy
dc.subjectOncolytic Virotherapy
dc.subjectOncolytic Viruses
dc.subjectTh17 Cells
dc.subjectMelanoma-Specific Antigens
dc.subjectCell Cycle Checkpoints
dc.titlePrime-boost using separate oncolytic viruses in combination with checkpoint blockade improves anti-tumour therapy.
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.dateAccepted2016-10-04
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1038/gt.2016.70
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttps://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2017-01
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review
dc.relation.isPartOfGene therapy
pubs.issue1
pubs.notes6 months
pubs.organisational-group/ICR
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Cancer Biology
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Cancer Biology/Targeted Therapy
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Radiotherapy and Imaging
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Radiotherapy and Imaging/Targeted Therapy
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Radiotherapy and Imaging/Translational Immunotherapy
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Radiotherapy and Imaging/Translational Immunotherapy/Translational Immunotherapy (TL)
pubs.organisational-group/ICR
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Cancer Biology
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Cancer Biology/Targeted Therapy
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Radiotherapy and Imaging
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Radiotherapy and Imaging/Targeted Therapy
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Radiotherapy and Imaging/Translational Immunotherapy
pubs.organisational-group/ICR/Primary Group/ICR Divisions/Radiotherapy and Imaging/Translational Immunotherapy/Translational Immunotherapy (TL)
pubs.publication-statusPublished
pubs.volume24
pubs.embargo.terms6 months
icr.researchteamTargeted Therapy
icr.researchteamTranslational Immunotherapy
dc.contributor.icrauthorHarrington, Kevin
dc.contributor.icrauthorMelcher, Alan


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following collection(s)

Show simple item record