Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorOwens, C
dc.contributor.authorHindocha, S
dc.contributor.authorLee, R
dc.contributor.authorMillard, T
dc.contributor.authorSharma, B
dc.coverage.spatialEngland
dc.date.accessioned2023-08-15T14:08:52Z
dc.date.available2023-08-15T14:08:52Z
dc.date.issued2023-08-01
dc.identifier.citationBritish Journal of Radiology, 2023, 96 (1148), pp. 20220339 -
dc.identifier.issn0007-1285
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.icr.ac.uk/handle/internal/5937
dc.identifier.eissn1748-880X
dc.identifier.eissn1748-880X
dc.identifier.doi10.1259/bjr.20220339
dc.description.abstractLung cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer and the leading cause of cancer deaths in both sexes combined. Recent years have seen major advances in the diagnostic and treatment options for patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), including the routine use of 2-deoxy-2[18F]-fluoro-D-glucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) in staging and response evaluation, minimally invasive endoscopic biopsy, targeted radiotherapy, minimally invasive surgery, and molecular and immunotherapies. In this review, the central roles of CT and 18F-FDG PET/CT in staging and response in both NSCLC and malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) are critically assessed. The Tumour Node Metastases (TNM-8) staging systems for NSCLC and MPM are presented with critical appraisal of the strengths and pitfalls of imaging. Overviews of the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST 1.1) for NSCLC and the modified RECIST criteria for MPM are provided, together with discussion of the benefits and limitations of these anatomical-based tools. Metabolic response assessment (not evaluated by RECIST 1.1) will be explored. We introduce the Positron Emission Tomography Response Criteria in Solid Tumours (PERCIST 1.0) to include its advantages and challenges. The limitations of both anatomical and metabolic assessment criteria when applied to NSCLC treated with immunotherapy and the important concept of pseudoprogression are addressed with reference to immune RECIST (iRECIST). Separate consideration is given to the diagnosis and follow up of solitary pulmonary nodules with reference to the British Thoracic Society guidelines and Fleischner guidelines and use of the Brock (CT-based) and Herder (addition of 18F-FDG PET/CT) models for assessing malignant potential. We discuss how these models inform decisions by the multidisciplinary team, including referral of suspicious nodules for non-surgical management in patients unsuitable for surgery. We briefly outline current lung screening systems being used in the UK, Europe and North America. Emerging roles for MRI in lung cancer imaging are reviewed. The use of whole-body MRI in diagnosing and staging NSCLC is discussed with reference to the recent multicentre Streamline L trial. The potential use of diffusion-weighted MRI to distinguish tumour from radiotherapy-induced lung toxicity is discussed. We briefly summarise the new PET-CT radiotracers being developed to evaluate specific aspects of cancer biology, other than glucose uptake. Finally, we describe how CT, MRI and 18F-FDG PET/CT are moving from primarily diagnostic tools for lung cancer towards having utility in prognostication and personalised medicine with the agency of artificial intelligence.
dc.formatPrint-Electronic
dc.format.extent20220339 -
dc.languageeng
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherBRITISH INST RADIOLOGY
dc.relation.ispartofBritish Journal of Radiology
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
dc.subjectMale
dc.subjectFemale
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectLung Neoplasms
dc.subjectPositron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography
dc.subjectCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung
dc.subjectFluorodeoxyglucose F18
dc.subjectArtificial Intelligence
dc.subjectRadiopharmaceuticals
dc.subjectPositron-Emission Tomography
dc.subjectMagnetic Resonance Imaging
dc.subjectNeoplasm Staging
dc.titleThe lung cancers: staging and response, CT, 18F-FDG PET/CT, MRI, DWI: review and new perspectives.
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.dateAccepted2023-02-22
dc.date.updated2023-08-15T14:07:15Z
rioxxterms.versionVoR
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1259/bjr.20220339
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2023-08-01
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review
pubs.author-urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37097296
pubs.issue1148
pubs.organisational-group/ICR
pubs.publication-statusPublished
pubs.publisher-urlhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20220339
pubs.volume96
dc.contributor.icrauthorSharma, Bhupinder
icr.provenanceDeposited by Mr Arek Surman (impersonating Prof Robert Huddart) on 2023-08-15. Deposit type is initial. No. of files: 1. Files: bjr.20220339.pdf


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following collection(s)

Show simple item record

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0