Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAllen, S
dc.contributor.authorLoong, L
dc.contributor.authorGarrett, A
dc.contributor.authorTorr, B
dc.contributor.authorDurkie, M
dc.contributor.authorDrummond, J
dc.contributor.authorCallaway, A
dc.contributor.authorRobinson, R
dc.contributor.authorBurghel, GJ
dc.contributor.authorHanson, H
dc.contributor.authorField, J
dc.contributor.authorMcDevitt, T
dc.contributor.authorMcVeigh, TP
dc.contributor.authorBedenham, T
dc.contributor.authorBowles, C
dc.contributor.authorBradshaw, K
dc.contributor.authorBrooks, C
dc.contributor.authorButler, S
dc.contributor.authorDel Rey Jimenez, JC
dc.contributor.authorHawkes, L
dc.contributor.authorStinton, V
dc.contributor.authorMacMahon, S
dc.contributor.authorOwens, M
dc.contributor.authorPalmer-Smith, S
dc.contributor.authorSmith, K
dc.contributor.authorTellez, J
dc.contributor.authorValganon-Petrizan, M
dc.contributor.authorWaskiewicz, E
dc.contributor.authorYau, M
dc.contributor.authorEccles, DM
dc.contributor.authorTischkowitz, M
dc.contributor.authorGoel, S
dc.contributor.authorMcRonald, F
dc.contributor.authorAntoniou, AC
dc.contributor.authorMorris, E
dc.contributor.authorHardy, S
dc.contributor.authorTurnbull, C
dc.coverage.spatialEngland
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-08T11:39:19Z
dc.date.available2024-01-08T11:39:19Z
dc.date.issued2024-03-21
dc.identifierjmg-2023-109645
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Medical Genetics, 2023,
dc.identifier.issn0022-2593
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.icr.ac.uk/handle/internal/6098
dc.identifier.eissn1468-6244
dc.identifier.eissn1468-6244
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/jmg-2023-109645
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/jmg-2023-109645
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: National and international amalgamation of genomic data offers opportunity for research and audit, including analyses enabling improved classification of variants of uncertain significance. Review of individual-level data from National Health Service (NHS) testing of cancer susceptibility genes (2002-2023) submitted to the National Disease Registration Service revealed heterogeneity across participating laboratories regarding (1) the structure, quality and completeness of submitted data, and (2) the ease with which that data could be assembled locally for submission. METHODS: In May 2023, we undertook a closed online survey of 51 clinical scientists who provided consensus responses representing all 17 of 17 NHS molecular genetic laboratories in England and Wales which undertake NHS diagnostic analyses of cancer susceptibility genes. The survey included 18 questions relating to 'next-generation sequencing workflow' (11), 'variant classification' (3) and 'phenotypical context' (4). RESULTS: Widely differing processes were reported for transfer of variant data into their local LIMS (Laboratory Information Management System), for the formatting in which the variants are stored in the LIMS and which classes of variants are retained in the local LIMS. Differing local provisions and workflow for variant classifications were also reported, including the resources provided and the mechanisms by which classifications are stored. CONCLUSION: The survey responses illustrate heterogeneous laboratory workflow for preparation of genomic variant data from local LIMS for centralised submission. Workflow is often labour-intensive and inefficient, involving multiple manual steps which introduce opportunities for error. These survey findings and adoption of the concomitant recommendations may support improvement in laboratory dataflows, better facilitating submission of data for central amalgamation.
dc.languageeng
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherBMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Medical Genetics
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subjectClinical Laboratory Techniques
dc.subjectGenetic Testing
dc.subjectGenetics
dc.subjectGenomics
dc.subjectMolecular Diagnostic Techniques
dc.titleRecommendations for laboratory workflow that better support centralised amalgamation of genomic variant data: findings from CanVIG-UK national molecular laboratory survey.
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.dateAccepted2023-10-28
dc.date.updated2024-01-05T16:42:54Z
rioxxterms.versionVoR
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1136/jmg-2023-109645
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2023-12-22
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review
pubs.author-urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38154813
pubs.organisational-groupICR
pubs.organisational-groupICR/Students
pubs.organisational-groupICR/Students/PhD and MPhil
pubs.organisational-groupICR/Students/PhD and MPhil/19/20 Starting Cohort
pubs.organisational-groupICR/Students/PhD and MPhil/20/21 Starting Cohort
pubs.publication-statusPublished online
pubs.publisher-urlhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jmg-2023-109645
icr.researchteamTranslational Genetics
dc.contributor.icrauthorAllen, Sophie
dc.contributor.icrauthorGarrett, Alice
dc.contributor.icrauthorPemberton - Whiteley, Bethany
dc.contributor.icrauthorMcVeigh, Terri
dc.contributor.icrauthorTurnbull, Clare
icr.provenanceDeposited by Miss Sophie Allen on 2024-01-05. Deposit type is initial. No. of files: 1. Files: jmg-2023-109645.full.pdf


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following collection(s)

Show simple item record

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/