Critical research gaps and recommendations to inform research prioritisation for more effective prevention and improved outcomes in colorectal cancer.
Bowel Cancer UK Critical Research Gaps in Colorectal Cancer Initiative
MetadataShow full item record
OBJECTIVE: Colorectal cancer (CRC) leads to significant morbidity/mortality worldwide. Defining critical research gaps (RG), their prioritisation and resolution, could improve patient outcomes. DESIGN: RG analysis was conducted by a multidisciplinary panel of patients, clinicians and researchers (n=71). Eight working groups (WG) were constituted: discovery science; risk; prevention; early diagnosis and screening; pathology; curative treatment; stage IV disease; and living with and beyond CRC. A series of discussions led to development of draft papers by each WG, which were evaluated by a 20-strong patient panel. A final list of RGs and research recommendations (RR) was endorsed by all participants. RESULTS: Fifteen critical RGs are summarised below: RG1: Lack of realistic models that recapitulate tumour/tumour micro/macroenvironment; RG2: Insufficient evidence on precise contributions of genetic/environmental/lifestyle factors to CRC risk; RG3: Pressing need for prevention trials; RG4: Lack of integration of different prevention approaches; RG5: Lack of optimal strategies for CRC screening; RG6: Lack of effective triage systems for invasive investigations; RG7: Imprecise pathological assessment of CRC; RG8: Lack of qualified personnel in genomics, data sciences and digital pathology; RG9: Inadequate assessment/communication of risk, benefit and uncertainty of treatment choices; RG10: Need for novel technologies/interventions to improve curative outcomes; RG11: Lack of approaches that recognise molecular interplay between metastasising tumours and their microenvironment; RG12: Lack of reliable biomarkers to guide stage IV treatment; RG13: Need to increase understanding of health related quality of life (HRQOL) and promote residual symptom resolution; RG14: Lack of coordination of CRC research/funding; RG15: Lack of effective communication between relevant stakeholders. CONCLUSION: Prioritising research activity and funding could have a significant impact on reducing CRC disease burden over the next 5 years.
Version of record
Early Detection of Cancer
Genetic Predisposition to Disease
Molecular & Population Genetics
License start date
Gut, 2018, 67 (1), pp. 179 - 193
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Plasma Carotenoid- and Retinol-Weighted Multi-SNP Scores and Risk of Breast Cancer in the National Cancer Institute Breast and Prostate Cancer Cohort Consortium Hendrickson, SJ; Lindstroem, S; Eliassen, AH; Rosner, BA; Chen, C; Barrdahl, M; Brinton, L; Buring, J; Canzian, F; Chanock, S; Clavel-Chapelon, F; Figueroa, JD; Gapstur, SM; Garcia-Closas, M; Gaudet, MM; Haiman, CA; Hazra, A; Henderson, B; Hoover, R; Husing, A; Johansson, M; Kaaks, R; Khaw, K-T; Kolonel, LN; Le Marchand, L; Lissowska, J; Lund, E; McCullough, ML; Peplonska, B; Riboli, E; Sacerdote, C; Sanchez, M-J; Tjonneland, A; Trichopoulos, D; van Gils, CH; Yeager, M; Kraft, P; Hunter, DJ; Ziegler, RG; Willett, WC (AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH, 2013-05)Background: Dietary and circulating carotenoids have been inversely associated with breast cancer risk, but observed associations may be due to confounding. Single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in beta-carotene ...
Can routine data be used to support cancer clinical trials? A historical baseline on which to build: retrospective linkage of data from the TACT (CRUK 01/001) breast cancer trial and the National Cancer Data Repository. Kilburn, LS; Aresu, M; Banerji, J; Barrett-Lee, P; Ellis, P; Bliss, JM (2017-11-23)BACKGROUND: Randomised clinical trials (RCTs) are the gold standard for evaluating new cancer treatments. They are, however, expensive to conduct, particularly where long-term follow-up of participants is required. Tracking ...