Catch my drift? Making sense of genomic intra-tumour heterogeneity.
MetadataShow full item record
The cancer genome is shaped by three components of the evolutionary process: mutation, selection and drift. While many studies have focused on the first two components, the role of drift in cancer evolution has received little attention. Drift occurs when all individuals in the population have the same likelihood of producing surviving offspring, and so by definition a drifting population is one that is evolving neutrally. Here we focus on how neutral evolution is manifested in the cancer genome. We discuss how neutral passenger mutations provide a magnifying glass that reveals the evolutionary dynamics underpinning cancer development, and outline how statistical inference can be used to quantify these dynamics from sequencing data. We argue that only after we understand the impact of neutral drift on the genome can we begin to make full sense of clonal selection. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: Evolutionary principles - heterogeneity in cancer? Edited by Dr. Robert A. Gatenby.
Version of record
Clonal evolution of cancer
Next generation sequencing
Cell Transformation, Neoplastic
Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic
Genetic Predisposition to Disease
Evolutionary Genomics & Modelling
License start date
Biochim Biophys Acta, 1867 (2), pp. 95 - 100
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Li, N; Johnson, DC; Weinhold, N; Kimber, S; Dobbins, SE; Mitchell, JS; Kinnersley, B; Sud, A; Law, PJ; Orlando, G; Scales, M; Wardell, CP; Försti, A; Hoang, PH; Went, M; Holroyd, A; Hariri, F; Pastinen, T; Meissner, T; Goldschmidt, H; Hemminki, K; Morgan, GJ; Kaiser, M; Houlston, RS (2017-09-12)Multiple myeloma (MM) is a malignancy of plasma cells. Genome-wide association studies have shown that variation at 5q15 influences MM risk. Here, we have sought to decipher the causal variant at 5q15 and the mechanism by ...
Association of breast cancer risk in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers with genetic variants showing differential allelic expression: identification of a modifier of breast cancer risk at locus 11q22.3. Hamdi, Y; Soucy, P; Kuchenbaeker, KB; Pastinen, T; Droit, A; Lemaçon, A; Adlard, J; Aittomäki, K; Andrulis, IL; Arason, A; Arnold, N; Arun, BK; Azzollini, J; Bane, A; Barjhoux, L; Barrowdale, D; Benitez, J; Berthet, P; Blok, MJ; Bobolis, K; Bonadona, V; Bonanni, B; Bradbury, AR; Brewer, C; Buecher, B; Buys, SS; Caligo, MA; Chiquette, J; Chung, WK; Claes, KBM; Daly, MB; Damiola, F; Davidson, R; De la Hoya, M; De Leeneer, K; Diez, O; Ding, YC; Dolcetti, R; Domchek, SM; Dorfling, CM; Eccles, D; Eeles, R; Einbeigi, Z; Ejlertsen, B; EMBRACE; Engel, C; Gareth Evans, D; Feliubadalo, L; Foretova, L; Fostira, F; Foulkes, WD; Fountzilas, G; Friedman, E; Frost, D; Ganschow, P; Ganz, PA; Garber, J; Gayther, SA; GEMO Study Collaborators; Gerdes, A-M; Glendon, G; Godwin, AK; Goldgar, DE; Greene, MH; Gronwald, J; Hahnen, E; Hamann, U; Hansen, TVO; Hart, S; Hays, JL; HEBON; Hogervorst, FBL; Hulick, PJ; Imyanitov, EN; Isaacs, C; Izatt, L; Jakubowska, A; James, P; Janavicius, R; Jensen, UB; John, EM; Joseph, V; Just, W; Kaczmarek, K; Karlan, BY; KConFab Investigators; Kets, CM; Kirk, J; Kriege, M; Laitman, Y; Laurent, M; Lazaro, C; Leslie, G; Lester, J; Lesueur, F; Liljegren, A; Loman, N; Loud, JT; Manoukian, S; Mariani, M; Mazoyer, S; McGuffog, L; Meijers-Heijboer, HEJ; Meindl, A; Miller, A; Montagna, M; Mulligan, AM; Nathanson, KL; Neuhausen, SL; Nevanlinna, H; Nussbaum, RL; Olah, E; Olopade, OI; Ong, K-R; Oosterwijk, JC; Osorio, A; Papi, L; Park, SK; Pedersen, IS; Peissel, B; Segura, PP; Peterlongo, P; Phelan, CM; Radice, P; Rantala, J; Rappaport-Fuerhauser, C; Rennert, G; Richardson, A; Robson, M; Rodriguez, GC; Rookus, MA; Schmutzler, RK; Sevenet, N; Shah, PD; Singer, CF; Slavin, TP; Snape, K; Sokolowska, J; Sønderstrup, IMH; Southey, M; Spurdle, AB; Stadler, Z; Stoppa-Lyonnet, D; Sukiennicki, G; Sutter, C; Tan, Y; Tea, M-K; Teixeira, MR; Teulé, A; Teo, S-H; Terry, MB; Thomassen, M; Tihomirova, L; Tischkowitz, M; Tognazzo, S; Toland, AE; Tung, N; van den Ouweland, AMW; van der Luijt, RB; van Engelen, K; van Rensburg, EJ; Varon-Mateeva, R; Wappenschmidt, B; Wijnen, JT; Rebbeck, T; Chenevix-Trench, G; Offit, K; Couch, FJ; Nord, S; Easton, DF; Antoniou, AC; Simard, JPURPOSE: Cis-acting regulatory SNPs resulting in differential allelic expression (DAE) may, in part, explain the underlying phenotypic variation associated with many complex diseases. To investigate whether common variants ...
Lin, H-Y; Chen, D-T; Huang, P-Y; Liu, Y-H; Ochoa, A; Zabaleta, J; Mercante, DE; Fang, Z; Sellers, TA; Pow-Sang, JM; Cheng, C-H; Eeles, R; Easton, D; Kote-Jarai, Z; Amin Al Olama, A; Benlloch, S; Muir, K; Giles, GG; Wiklund, F; Gronberg, H; Haiman, CA; Schleutker, J; Nordestgaard, BG; Travis, RC; Hamdy, F; Pashayan, N; Khaw, K-T; Stanford, JL; Blot, WJ; Thibodeau, SN; Maier, C; Kibel, AS; Cybulski, C; Cannon-Albright, L; Brenner, H; Kaneva, R; Batra, J; Teixeira, MR; Pandha, H; Lu, Y-J; PRACTICAL Consortium; Park, JYMotivation: Testing SNP-SNP interactions is considered as a key for overcoming bottlenecks of genetic association studies. However, related statistical methods for testing SNP-SNP interactions are underdeveloped. Results: ...