DNA-Repair Defects and Olaparib in Metastatic Prostate Cancer.
View/ Open
Date
2015-10-29ICR Author
Author
Mateo, J
Carreira, S
Sandhu, S
Miranda, S
Mossop, H
Perez-Lopez, R
Nava Rodrigues, D
Robinson, D
Omlin, A
Tunariu, N
Boysen, G
Porta, N
Flohr, P
Gillman, A
Figueiredo, I
Paulding, C
Seed, G
Jain, S
Ralph, C
Protheroe, A
Hussain, S
Jones, R
Elliott, T
McGovern, U
Bianchini, D
Goodall, J
Zafeiriou, Z
Williamson, CT
Ferraldeschi, R
Riisnaes, R
Ebbs, B
Fowler, G
Roda, D
Yuan, W
Wu, Y-M
Cao, X
Brough, R
Pemberton, H
A'Hern, R
Swain, A
Kunju, LP
Eeles, R
Attard, G
Lord, CJ
Ashworth, A
Rubin, MA
Knudsen, KE
Feng, FY
Chinnaiyan, AM
Hall, E
de Bono, JS
Type
Journal Article
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
BACKGROUND: Prostate cancer is a heterogeneous disease, but current treatments are not based on molecular stratification. We hypothesized that metastatic, castration-resistant prostate cancers with DNA-repair defects would respond to poly(adenosine diphosphate [ADP]-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibition with olaparib. METHODS: We conducted a phase 2 trial in which patients with metastatic, castration-resistant prostate cancer were treated with olaparib tablets at a dose of 400 mg twice a day. The primary end point was the response rate, defined either as an objective response according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1, or as a reduction of at least 50% in the prostate-specific antigen level or a confirmed reduction in the circulating tumor-cell count from 5 or more cells per 7.5 ml of blood to less than 5 cells per 7.5 ml. Targeted next-generation sequencing, exome and transcriptome analysis, and digital polymerase-chain-reaction testing were performed on samples from mandated tumor biopsies. RESULTS: Overall, 50 patients were enrolled; all had received prior treatment with docetaxel, 49 (98%) had received abiraterone or enzalutamide, and 29 (58%) had received cabazitaxel. Sixteen of 49 patients who could be evaluated had a response (33%; 95% confidence interval, 20 to 48), with 12 patients receiving the study treatment for more than 6 months. Next-generation sequencing identified homozygous deletions, deleterious mutations, or both in DNA-repair genes--including BRCA1/2, ATM, Fanconi's anemia genes, and CHEK2--in 16 of 49 patients who could be evaluated (33%). Of these 16 patients, 14 (88%) had a response to olaparib, including all 7 patients with BRCA2 loss (4 with biallelic somatic loss, and 3 with germline mutations) and 4 of 5 with ATM aberrations. The specificity of the biomarker suite was 94%. Anemia (in 10 of the 50 patients [20%]) and fatigue (in 6 [12%]) were the most common grade 3 or 4 adverse events, findings that are consistent with previous studies of olaparib. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with the PARP inhibitor olaparib in patients whose prostate cancers were no longer responding to standard treatments and who had defects in DNA-repair genes led to a high response rate. (Funded by Cancer Research UK and others; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01682772; Cancer Research UK number, CRUK/11/029.).
Collections
Subject
Humans
Prostatic Neoplasms
Neoplasm Metastasis
Anemia
Fatigue
Piperazines
Phthalazines
Antineoplastic Agents
Enzyme Inhibitors
DNA Repair
Drug Resistance, Neoplasm
Mutation
Genes, Tumor Suppressor
Genes, BRCA2
Adult
Aged
Middle Aged
Male
Ataxia Telangiectasia Mutated Proteins
Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors
Research team
Cancer Biomarkers
ICR-CTSU Urology and Head and Neck Trials Team
Development & Cancer
Gene Function
Treatment Resistance
Oncogenetics
Cancer Biomarkers
ICR-CTSU Urology and Head and Neck Trials Team
Development & Cancer
Gene Function
Treatment Resistance
Oncogenetics
Language
eng
Date accepted
2015-10-01
Citation
The New England journal of medicine, 2015, 373 (18), pp. 1697 - 1708
Publisher
MASSACHUSETTS MEDICAL SOC